Dynamic Portal AI for Request Intake Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional request intake systems are not user-friendly, failing to identify and alert users of missing or inconsistent information and lacking educational guidance during the submission process, while also not interfacing effectively with other systems to submit generated text documents.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic portal system that uses natural language processing and machine learning to analyze user requests, identify issues, determine relevant rules, and provide educational information, while interfacing with electronic filing systems to submit completed documents and generate alerts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional request intake systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the user experience is poor due to lack of identification and alerting of missing or inconsistent information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an AI processor as an intermediary component between the user portal and the request processing system. This AI processor analyzes intake requests, identifies issues, and provides alerts about missing or inconsistent information, thereby improving user experience without requiring complete system restructuring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual review processes with automated AI-based analysis. The AI processor uses natural language processing and machine learning models to automatically identify issues in intake requests, substituting human operators and reducing system complexity while improving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If conventional request intake systems are used, then the system is simple, but educational guidance is not provided during the submission process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeducational guidanceVSAvoidsystem functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the AI processor analyzes intake requests and provides real-time alerts and educational guidance to users about missing or inconsistent information. This feedback loop improves ease of operation by guiding users through the submission process while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables users to self-correct their intake requests by providing them with specific alerts about missing or inconsistent information. Users can independently identify and fix issues based on system feedback without requiring external assistance, improving ease of operation while keeping the system relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional request intake systems are used, then the system architecture is simple, but effective interface with other systems for document submission is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrationVSAvoidsoftware interface
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the AI processor a universal component that can interface with multiple different systems (electronic filing systems, case management systems, etc.). This single AI processor handles various document types and submission formats, improving adaptability while managing software interface complexity through a unified approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If manual review of intake requests is performed, then system complexity is low, but productivity and completeness of requests are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest processing efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual review processes with automated AI-based analysis. The AI processor uses natural language processing and machine learning to rapidly analyze intake requests, identifying issues and determining completeness automatically. This substitution dramatically improves productivity while managing system complexity through standardized processing algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12175192B2Systems and methods for dynamic portals
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 LEGAL ACCESS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LLC
  • US12175192B2 patent drawing
  • US12175192B2 patent drawing
  • US12175192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

At least some aspects of the present disclosure direct to systems and methods of dynamic portals implemented on a computer system having one or more processors and memories. The methods includes the steps of: presenting a user portal comprising an interactive region and an informational region; receiving an intake request submitted by a user via the interactive region, the intake request being a text stream; analyzing the intake request to identify an issue associated with the intake request; determining at least one rule of a plurality of rules relevant to the issue; selecting one or more pieces of educational information from a rule repository based on the at least one relevant rule; and updating the user portal.