Dynamic POS Terminal Allocation for Retail Throughput Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current retail service locations face inefficiencies due to mismatched numbers and types of manned and unmanned POS terminals, leading to reduced customer throughput, increased overhead, and decreased profit margins, as the configuration does not align with customer arrival rates and basket contents.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for optimizing service location configurations using video data to derive utilization metrics, predict operational characteristics, and optimize POS terminal operations, including calculating wait times and selecting optimal POS terminals based on target values, to match customer demand dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of POS terminals is increased, then customer service coverage is improved, but capital expenditure and operational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer throughputVSAvoidnumber of POS terminals
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of POS terminal operational status based on real-time customer traffic patterns. The system transitions POS terminals between active and inactive states according to demand fluctuations throughout the day, allowing the same physical infrastructure to adapt its capacity without requiring additional hardware. This resolves the contradiction by making the existing terminal fleet flexible rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (active/inactive states) of existing POS terminals based on temporal patterns and customer arrival rates. By adjusting which terminals are operational at different times rather than keeping all terminals constantly active, the system optimizes customer throughput while reducing the effective number of terminals in use, thereby lowering capital expenditure requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If more POS terminals are kept operational, then customer wait time is reduced, but operational overhead and resource utilization efficiency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer wait timeVSAvoidoperational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic activation and deactivation of POS terminals based on predicted customer arrival patterns. During peak periods, more terminals are activated to reduce wait times; during off-peak periods, terminals are deactivated to reduce operational overhead. This periodic adjustment aligns resource availability with actual demand cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time monitoring of customer traffic and wait times to provide feedback on terminal utilization. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of terminal operational status, ensuring that terminals are activated only when customer demand justifies their operation, thereby minimizing operational overhead while maintaining acceptable service levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If POS terminal configuration is optimized for peak demand, then customer throughput is improved, but resource utilization during off-peak times deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer throughputVSAvoidflexibility to demand variations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational configuration of POS terminals to match varying demand levels. Rather than maintaining a static configuration optimized for peak demand, the system transitions terminals between active and inactive states based on real-time and predicted demand, providing flexibility across different operational periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The same POS terminal infrastructure serves multiple functions across different time periods: handling high-volume peak transactions when activated and remaining dormant during off-peak periods. This multi-functionality allows the system to optimize for peak throughput without permanently over-provisioning resources that would otherwise remain underutilized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240403741A1Systems and methods for service location optimization
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 MARS INC
  • US20240403741A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403741A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403741A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for service location optimization may include methods for deriving service location utilization data from video, predicting an operational characteristic of a service location, optimizing an operational characteristic of a service location, and presenting a user interface for user-directed optimization of an operational characteristic of a service location.