Dynamic Power Control Signaling in Wireless Communications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, power control resources are often assigned statically, leading to non-optimal use of resources as some user equipment (UEs) may not be transmitting or may be transmitting at non-optimal power levels, resulting in inefficient resource allocation and potential interference.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for dynamically controlling power in wireless communication systems by identifying UEs transmitting at non-optimal power levels, generating power control messages with mapped commands to specific resources, and transmitting these messages to adjust power levels, allowing for dynamic signaling and efficient resource allocation based on radio conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power control resources are assigned statically to all UEs, then every UE can receive power control commands, but resources are wasted when UEs are not transmitting or transmitting at optimal power levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control reliabilityVSAvoidresource wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic power control resource allocation where the base station determines which UEs require power control commands based on current transmission status and radio conditions. Power control resources are dynamically assigned only to UEs that need adjustments, transforming the static allocation system into a dynamic one that adapts to real-time network conditions, thereby eliminating resource wastage while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of power control resource allocation from a fixed static state to a variable dynamic state. The base station monitors transmission power levels and radio conditions, then adjusts the allocation of power control resources accordingly, changing the operational parameters based on actual network needs rather than maintaining constant allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If power control commands are transmitted to all UEs continuously, then all UEs can maintain optimal power levels, but system efficiency decreases due to unnecessary signaling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower level optimizationVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates only the UEs that require power control commands from the entire UE population. The base station identifies specific UEs with non-optimal power levels and allocates power control resources only to those extracted targets, rather than transmitting commands to all UEs continuously. This extraction approach eliminates unnecessary signaling while maintaining power optimization for those who need it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying power control commands universally to all UEs (excessive action), the system applies partial action only to the subset of UEs that actually require power adjustments. This partial approach avoids the waste of transmitting unnecessary commands to UEs already operating at optimal power levels, thereby improving system efficiency while maintaining reliability for those who need control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If resources are dynamically allocated based on transmission needs, then resource efficiency improves, but complexity of power control management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidpower control management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where UEs report their transmission status and power levels to the base station. The base station uses this feedback information to dynamically determine which UEs require power control commands and allocates resources accordingly. This feedback loop automates the decision-making process, managing the complexity through systematic information gathering and response rather than ad-hoc management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables UEs to self-identify their power control needs through their transmission behavior and reported status. The base station automatically detects which UEs require power adjustments based on their own transmission patterns and radio conditions, allowing the system to self-manage resource allocation without complex external intervention or manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9155053B2Methods and apparatuses for power control in wireless communications
Publication Date: 2015.10.06 QUALCOMM INC
  • US9155053B2 patent drawing
  • US9155053B2 patent drawing
  • US9155053B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Downlink power control commands are mapped to resources used for uplink communications within a wireless communication system. A base station receives communications from UEs and determines the resources used by the UEs for those transmissions on the uplink which are transmitted at non-optimum power levels. Power control messages are formulated wherein the location of the power control commands is mapped to particular resources used by the UEs for their uplink transmissions. This facilitates the base station to dynamically assign resources for the power control commands while permitting the UEs to decode the power control messages to adjust their power accordingly.