Dynamic Precision Control for Peripheral Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing input devices, such as computer mice and game controllers, require non-real-time, manual adjustments for sensitivity settings, which disrupt workflow and hinder precision in applications like gaming, graphic design, and robotic control.

Innovation Solution

The integration of various sensors, including analog and digital, as modifier inputs for real-time sensitivity adjustments, allowing users to actuate changes through devices like foot pedals or voice controls, freeing hands for primary interactions and enabling continuous fine-tuning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual finger-based adjustments are used for sensitivity settings, then control precision can be adjusted, but workflow continuity is disrupted and reaction speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity control precisionVSAvoidworkflow continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual finger-based mechanical adjustments with foot pedal-based mechanical input. The foot pedal acts as a modifier input device that allows sensitivity adjustments without requiring hand involvement, thereby maintaining workflow continuity while achieving precise control adjustments through mechanical means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a foot pedal as an intermediary device between the user and the sensitivity control system. This intermediary allows the user to adjust sensitivity settings using their foot, freeing their hands to maintain interaction with the primary device while still achieving precise control adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If discrete sensitivity settings are provided, then device complexity is reduced, but control granularity is insufficient for precision applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol interface simplicityVSAvoidsensitivity adjustment granularity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static discrete sensitivity settings into dynamic continuous adjustments. The foot pedal provides a range of sensitivity values that can be adjusted in real-time based on the degree of pedal depression, allowing for fine-grained control while maintaining a simple physical interface with only one moving component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the sensitivity parameter from discrete fixed values to continuous variable values. The foot pedal enables smooth transitions between sensitivity levels, allowing users to select from a spectrum of sensitivity settings rather than being constrained to predefined discrete stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If software-based adjustments are implemented, then control flexibility is improved, but real-time responsiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity control flexibilityVSAvoidreal-time adjustment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces software-based digital adjustments with direct mechanical input through the foot pedal. The mechanical movement of the pedal is directly translated into sensitivity adjustments without requiring software processing delays, enabling real-time responsiveness while maintaining control flexibility through various sensitivity ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides seamless, real-time sensitivity adjustments, enhancing control and precision in interactions with computer systems, gaming environments, and robotic systems, accommodating diverse user needs without manual interruptions.

Implementation Method 1

Dynamic Signal Modification System with Resistive Sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistive sensing: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS20250103515A1Dynamic Precision Control System for Peripheral Data Output with ResistiveSensors
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 SMITH CRYSTAL
  • US20250103515A1 patent drawing
  • US20250103515A1 patent drawing
  • US20250103515A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A Computing based control system for managing signals from a variety of input devices equipped with sensors, such as resistive potentiometers pedals, load cell buttons, pressure sensitive, optical, capacitive, magnetic, voice activated, proximity, sonar and other types of sensors or I/O devices. The system comprises of at least one Hub or electronic control system including one or more processing units, memory units for storing instructions and saving data, and other components such as long-term storage devices, display units, networking, interfaces and more, with the system receiving information from the sensors, processing inputs and dynamically adjusting a range of control parameters, including but not limited to cursor speed and DPI settings. The system can communicate multi-directionally with multiple peripherals, allowing real-time customization and refinement of settings and output characteristics for sensor devices. System can be configured as standalone external hub or integrated within the sensor devices or peripherals incorporating software-based controls.