Dynamic Pressure Control in 3D Printing Enclosures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing systems, particularly 3D printing systems, face challenges in managing pressure differentials within enclosures, which can disrupt the printing process due to reactive agents like oxygen and water in the ambient atmosphere, leading to defects in the manufactured products and increased costs from using inert gases.

Innovation Solution

A control scheme is implemented to curb pressure differentials by expelling or introducing gas into the enclosure, using a reservoir or gas source, and adjusting gas volumes through valves, with feedback and feed-forward control systems to maintain optimal pressure levels, reducing the need for inert gases and minimizing disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If inert gas (robust gas) is used to maintain pressure differential in the enclosure, then protection from reactive agents (oxygen, water) is improved, but cost increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from reactive agentsVSAvoidcost of inert gas
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes pressure parameters (positive, negative, or neutral pressure differential) based on process requirements rather than maintaining constant positive pressure with inert gas. This allows protection from reactive agents when needed while reducing inert gas consumption during phases where protection is less critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the enclosure's own pressure control capabilities to manage reactive agent exposure, rather than relying continuously on inert gas atmosphere. The pressure differential itself serves as the protective mechanism, eliminating the need for substantial inert gas consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If pressure differential is maintained in the enclosure during manufacturing, then protection from reactive agents is improved, but disruption to manufacturing process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from reactive agentsVSAvoiddisruption to manufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure differential is made dynamic rather than static, adjusting in real-time based on process stage and requirements. The system transitions between positive, negative, and neutral pressure states to match manufacturing needs, minimizing disruption while maintaining protection when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies pressure differential control in periodic cycles aligned with manufacturing stages, maintaining pressure protection during critical phases (material deposition, curing) while allowing pressure equalization during less sensitive phases (layer removal, platform heating), thereby reducing overall process disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If pressure differential is quickly rectified, then disruption to manufacturing process is reduced, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminimization of process disruptionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors pressure differential and process stage, using feedback signals to automatically adjust pressure control actions. This closed-loop control enables quick rectification of pressure differentials while managing complexity through automated decision-making based on predefined process parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively stabilizes the internal environment of 3D printing systems, reducing defects and costs by efficiently managing pressure differentials and maintaining optimal gas composition within the enclosure, thereby enhancing the manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

the reservoir being configured to (i) enclose the gas in the reservoir when the exchange comprises egress of the gas from the enclosure, and (ii) release the gas disposed in the reservoir when the exchange comprises ingress of the gas into the enclosure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20240408828A1Pressure control in manufacturing systems
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 VELO3D INC
  • US20240408828A1 patent drawing
  • US20240408828A1 patent drawing
  • US20240408828A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides manufacturing systems and associated devices, apparatuses, methods, and non-transitory computer readable media, in relation to pressure control in at least a portion of the manufacturing system, e.g., a three-dimensional printing system. The pressure control may consider various aspect of the printed 3D object(s) and/or the material bed utilized for printing the 3D object(s). The pressure control may utilize one or more reservoirs, e.g., at least a portion of a gas conveyance system of the 3D printer. The pressure control may reduce disturbances in an exposed surface of the material bed during the printing.