Dynamic Print Head Servicing via Quality Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional print head array servicing is inflexible and often results in unnecessary downtime and resource wastage, as it does not consider user preferences for image quality versus quantity, leading to unsatisfactory printing experiences.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a print controller software that dynamically determines when to service a print head array based on user-defined quality thresholds, allowing for flexible printing by using additional print head arrays to continue or resume print jobs without interrupting image completion, unless image quality is significantly compromised.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fixed-schedule servicing is implemented, then print head array maintenance is performed, but printing downtime increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint head array maintenanceVSAvoidprinting output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from fixed-schedule servicing to dynamic condition-based servicing. The print controller continuously monitors print head array conditions and dynamically determines when servicing is necessary, allowing printing operations to continue uninterrupted as long as quality thresholds are met, thus resolving the contradiction between maintenance reliability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter for triggering servicing from fixed time intervals to variable quality thresholds. By monitoring image quality parameters and comparing them against user-defined thresholds, the system only initiates servicing when actually needed, eliminating unnecessary downtime while maintaining acceptable print quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If print head array servicing is performed, then image quality is maintained, but printing time is lost and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprinting downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous printing operations by implementing real-time quality monitoring and dynamic threshold comparison. Printing continues uninterrupted as long as image quality remains above the user-defined threshold, eliminating the need to stop for routine servicing and thus reducing time loss while maintaining quality standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If strict image quality control is enforced, then print quality is maintained, but printing operations are interrupted frequently and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprinting output
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the balance between quality control and productivity by using user-defined thresholds. Rather than enforcing fixed strict quality controls that cause frequent interruptions, the system allows printing to continue as long as quality meets the threshold, and only interrupts when quality actually deteriorates below the acceptable level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If user flexibility in quality versus quantity preference is provided, then user satisfaction improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser preference flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring image quality and comparing it against user-defined thresholds. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically adapt to user preferences regarding quality versus quantity, providing flexibility without requiring complex manual intervention or system reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9656494B2Servicing a print head array
Publication Date: 2017.05.23 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US9656494B2 patent drawing
  • US9656494B2 patent drawing
  • US9656494B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a print controller is to receive a preference relating to a choice between quantity in printing images by a printing apparatus and quality of printed images and vary a threshold value according to the received preference to produce a dynamically set threshold value. The print controller is to further initiate printing of a print job using the first print head array, determine whether an image quality defect value associated with printing at least one of image of the print job exceeds the dynamically set threshold value, in response to determining that the image quality defect value does not exceed the dynamically set threshold value, continue printing the at least one image with the first print head array, and in response to determining that the image quality defect value exceeds the dynamically set threshold value, cause movement of the first print head array from a first position to the servicing station.