Dynamic Printing Quality Evaluation Using Presentation Attributes
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current print quality determination methods rely on static thresholds that do not consider the intended use of the printed image, leading to potential suboptimal printing outcomes.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method that evaluates a printing configuration by obtaining presentation attributes of a physical reproduction during intended use, determining perceived quality based on electronic document properties and presentation attributes, allowing for dynamic adjustment of printing settings.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If static quality thresholds are used for image printing, then the printing process is simple and fast, but the quality determination does not account for intended use and may lead to suboptimal printing outcomes
Solution Approach 1:
The patent transforms the static quality threshold system into a dynamic one by introducing presentation attributes that change based on intended use. Instead of fixed DPI thresholds, the system dynamically adjusts quality parameters based on viewing distance, viewing angle, and other presentation-specific factors, allowing the same image to be evaluated differently for different use cases such as posters versus business cards
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameters used for quality determination from static resolution values to dynamic parameters including presentation attributes. By introducing new parameters such as viewing distance, viewing angle, and illumination conditions, the system adapts quality thresholds to match the specific presentation context, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability
2Measurement precision
If presentation attributes are considered in quality determination, then quality assessment accuracy improves, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the quality determination process into distinct components: electronic document properties, printing attributes, and presentation attributes. Each segment handles specific aspects of quality assessment, making the overall complex system more manageable. The segmentation allows independent evaluation of each factor while maintaining their interrelationships in the final quality determination
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces an intermediary computational model that translates between electronic document properties, printing attributes, and presentation attributes. This intermediary layer processes the complex interactions between multiple factors and produces a simplified perceived quality metric, reducing the apparent complexity for users while maintaining high assessment accuracy
3Ease of manufacture
If static quality thresholds are applied, then implementation is straightforward, but waste may occur due to rejection of acceptable images for specific uses
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary quality assessment by evaluating presentation attributes before the actual printing decision is made. By calculating perceived quality in advance based on intended use parameters, the system identifies which images are suitable for specific purposes beforehand, preventing unnecessary rejections and reducing waste while maintaining straightforward implementation through automated pre-evaluation
Data Source
AI summary
A solution for evaluating a printing configuration for an electronic document in which one or more presentation attributes of a physical reproduction (e.g., a printed copy) of the electronic document are considered. A perceived quality of the physical reproduction of the electronic document can be determined using a set of properties of the electronic document and the one or more presentation attributes. The perceived quality can be utilized in various ways as part of a printing process.