Dynamic Quantum Error Correction via Qubit Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Quantum error correction in quantum computing is challenging due to the no-cloning theorem, entanglement properties, and decoherence, which complicates error correction without measurement and can lead to exponential error propagation, necessitating efficient error reduction and optimal qubit allocation.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic error correction scheme that modifies quantum circuits to transfer gate operations and synthesizes them using a larger number of physical qubits than logical qubits, with a search algorithm to optimize error correction operations based on quality scores correlated to error rates, allowing for asymmetrical allocation of physical qubits to logical qubits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If quantum error correction is implemented using standard allocation methods, then error correction coverage is provided, but resource utilization is inefficient and error rates remain high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction effectivenessVSAvoidphysical qubit allocation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic qubit allocation where the number of physical qubits assigned to each logical qubit changes over time based on operational needs. The system transitions between different allocation configurations (e.g., 1:1, 9:1, 49:1 ratios) at different cycles, allowing optimal resource utilization while maintaining error correction effectiveness throughout the quantum circuit execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the allocation parameter (physical qubits per logical qubit) based on the operational phase. During measurement cycles, more physical qubits are allocated to measurement logical qubits, while during gate operation cycles, allocation shifts to gate logical qubits. This parameter adjustment optimizes error correction for the current operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If gate operations are transferred between cycles to optimize error correction, then error rates are reduced, but circuit depth increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rateVSAvoidcircuit depth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by transferring gate operations to adjacent cycles where appropriate error correction resources are available. Gate operations are scheduled in advance to coincide with cycles that have optimal physical qubit allocation for the required logical qubits, preventing errors before they occur rather than correcting them afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic transfer of gate operations between cycles, creating a rhythmic pattern of operation transfer that aligns with the error correction cycles. This periodic restructuring allows the circuit to benefit from optimal error correction at regular intervals while maintaining overall functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If asymmetrical allocation of physical qubits is used to optimize error correction, then error rates for critical operations are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rate for critical operationsVSAvoidallocation management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different allocation qualities to different logical qubits based on their specific needs. Measurement logical qubits receive different physical qubit allocation than gate logical qubits, and this allocation varies by cycle. This localized optimization ensures that critical operations receive enhanced error protection without unnecessarily complicating the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system temporarily discards physical qubits from certain logical qubits during cycles when they are not needed, and recovers them for use with other logical qubits in subsequent cycles. This dynamic reuse reduces the total number of physical qubits required while maintaining error correction effectiveness for critical operations when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS11875229B2Determining dynamic quantum error correction
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 CLASSIQ TECH LTD
  • US11875229B2 patent drawing
  • US11875229B2 patent drawing
  • US11875229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and product includes obtaining a logical representation of a quantum circuit; modifying the quantum circuit to transfer a gate operation defined in a first cycle to be performed in a second cycle, thereby obtaining a modified quantum circuit, wherein said modifying does not change a functionality of the quantum circuit, and synthesizing the modified quantum circuit using a dynamic error correction scheme. The dynamic error correction scheme implements error correction operations using a first assignment of first physical qubits to a logical qubit for a first set of cycles and using a second assignment of second physical qubits to the logical qubit for a second set of cycles, wherein the first set of cycles comprises the first cycle, and the second set of cycles comprises the second cycle.