Dynamic Question Generation for Media Asset Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in providing a thorough analysis of media assets by dynamically generating relevant questions and answer choices that effectively elicit feedback, especially considering the complexities of global regulatory environments and cultural differences.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of machine learning technologies, including natural language processing and prompt engineering, to analyze media asset contexts, dynamically generate questions and answers, and update user response collection interfaces based on user inputs and geographical taxonomies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If machine learning models are used to dynamically generate questions and answers, then the relevance and effectiveness of feedback collection is improved, but the system complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of questions and answersVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing media asset data, extracting relevant features, and preparing context information before question generation is requested. This reduces the computational burden during actual question generation while maintaining adaptability and relevance of the generated content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components such as prompt engineering layers and context processing modules that mediate between the raw media asset data and the machine learning model. These intermediaries transform complex input data into structured formats that the model can process efficiently, reducing overall system complexity while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If dynamic question generation is implemented, then the ability to elicit relevant feedback is improved, but the time required to generate questions and process responses increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback collection efficiencyVSAvoidquestion generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by generating only the most relevant questions and answers based on the media asset context, rather than generating all possible questions. This selective approach maintains feedback collection efficiency while significantly reducing the time required for question generation compared to comprehensive generation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by updating and regenerating questions at strategic intervals rather than continuously. The system monitors context changes and triggers question regeneration only when necessary, maintaining productivity while minimizing the time spent on repeated generation cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If user response collection interfaces are continuously updated based on user inputs, then the personalization and effectiveness of feedback collection is improved, but the cognitive load on users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of feedback collectionVSAvoiduser cognitive load
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by personalizing only specific portions of the feedback collection interface based on user responses, rather than fundamentally changing the entire interaction paradigm. This allows the interface to adapt and become more personalized while maintaining familiar, low-cognitive-load interaction patterns for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system monitors user responses and adjusts subsequent questions accordingly, but with rate limiting and pattern recognition to avoid overwhelming users. The feedback loop is designed to be subtle and contextual, improving personalization while keeping cognitive load manageable through intelligent pacing and selection of follow-up questions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240185099A1User response collection interface generation and management using machine learning technologies
Publication Date: 2024.06.06 SPHEREX INC
  • US20240185099A1 patent drawing
  • US20240185099A1 patent drawing
  • US20240185099A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments described herein support or provide generation and management operations of user response collection interfaces using machine learning technologies, including receiving a user input from a user interface of a device, the user input including data content that describes context of a media asset; using a machine learning model to generate analysis of the context of the media asset based on the data content; dynamically generating a question based on the analysis of the context of the media asset; and causing display of the question and the plurality of answers on the user interface of the device.