Dynamic RACH Backoff Indicator for LTE Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In LTE networks, the fixed Backoff Indicator (BI) configuration leads to inefficient UE access times and premature exhaustion of preamble transmission attempts when handling large numbers of UEs, particularly in high-load scenarios like urban environments, as it either results in prolonged waiting times or excessive UE access times.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic RACH response backoff indicator method that estimates load based on preamble detection and noise floor levels, or uses UE connection effort data to decide between zero or non-zero BI values, optimizing BI configuration in real-time to balance UE access time and network load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed Backoff Indicator configuration is used, then the system is simple to implement, but UE access time increases and preamble transmission attempts are exhausted prematurely in high-load scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidUE access time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic Backoff Indicator configuration where the eNB adjusts the BI value based on real-time PRACH load conditions. The BI is no longer fixed but adapts to current network state, allowing optimal balance between UE access time and load management. This resolves the contradiction by making the system dynamic rather than static, improving UE access time while maintaining implementation feasibility through standardized procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a feedback mechanism where the eNB monitors PRACH preamble detection results and noise floor levels, then uses this information to dynamically adjust the Backoff Indicator. The feedback loop enables the system to respond to actual load conditions, reducing UE access time in high-load scenarios while preventing premature preamble exhaustion, thereby resolving the contradiction between implementation simplicity and performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If a fixed Backoff Indicator configuration is used, then the system is stable, but network handling efficiency deteriorates in high-traffic situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidnetwork handling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a fixed BI configuration to a dynamic one that adapts to PRACH load conditions. The eNB monitors preamble detection success rates and noise floor levels, then adjusts the BI accordingly. This maintains system stability through controlled adaptation while significantly improving network handling efficiency in high-traffic scenarios by optimizing UE access timing based on actual network state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the BI parameter dynamically based on measured load conditions. Instead of using a fixed BI value, the system adjusts the backoff time parameter according to PRACH preamble detection results and noise floor measurements. This parameter change enables the system to maintain stability through standardized procedures while improving productivity by optimizing access timing under varying traffic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If a zero Backoff Indicator is used, then UE access time is minimized, but preamble transmission attempts are exhausted prematurely under high load

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE access timeVSAvoidpreamble transmission success
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic BI adjustment that responds to PRACH load conditions. When load is low, the BI is set to zero or minimal values, minimizing UE access time. When load increases and preamble exhaustion risk is detected, the BI is increased to spread out access attempts. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by adapting the BI to current conditions, maintaining both fast access and reliable transmission success.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces feedback mechanisms where the eNB monitors preamble detection results and noise floor levels to determine appropriate BI values. This feedback enables the system to use zero BI when conditions permit (minimizing access time) while increasing BI when load conditions indicate risk of premature exhaustion (maintaining reliability). The feedback loop resolves the contradiction by making informed decisions about BI configuration based on actual network state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If a non-zero Backoff Indicator is used, then preamble transmission exhaustion is prevented, but UE access time increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreamble transmission successVSAvoidUE access time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the BI value adaptive rather than consistently non-zero. The system monitors PRACH load conditions and adjusts the BI accordingly - using minimal or zero BI when load is low (reducing access time) and increasing BI only when necessary to prevent exhaustion (maintaining reliability). This resolves the contradiction by eliminating excessive backoff while maintaining protection against preamble exhaustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the BI parameter dynamically based on measured load conditions rather than using a fixed non-zero value. The eNB adjusts the backoff time parameter according to preamble detection success rates and noise floor levels, using smaller values when conditions permit to reduce UE access time while maintaining reliability through standardized procedures and monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230103991A1Dynamic RACH Response Backoff Indicator
Publication Date: 2023.04.06 PARALLEL WIRELESS INC
  • US20230103991A1 patent drawing
  • US20230103991A1 patent drawing
  • US20230103991A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a first embodiment, a method for determining a dynamic RACH response backoff indicator is disclosed, comprising: estimating a load on the PRACH, based on a number of preambles detected for each PRACH slot, noise floor level, and other Phy features; and using this as an input to perform dynamic backoff indicator selection. In a second embodiment, a method for determining dynamic RACH response backoff indicator is disclosed, comprising: determining, by using the information provided by the connected UEs, how much effort was required to connect with an eNB; and deciding, by a dynamic core allocation, if a zero backoff indicator can be used or a non-zero backoff indicator value is needed to be used.