Dynamic Rate Limiting for Autonomous Vehicle Service Requests

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicle systems face challenges in managing and filtering requests to backend services effectively, leading to potential overload and performance degradation due to unchecked requests from vehicle providers and malicious parties.

Innovation Solution

Implementing dynamic bucketized rate limiters that determine and enforce thresholds for requests based on vehicle providers and software services, using attributes like usage history, environmental conditions, and service-specific requirements to filter and prioritize requests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous vehicle systems accept all requests from vehicle providers without filtering, then service availability and responsiveness are improved, but system overload and performance degradation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rate limiting mechanism performs preliminary filtering of requests before they reach the backend services. By evaluating requests against predetermined rate limits and thresholds in advance, the system prevents overload conditions before they occur, maintaining both service availability and system performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The rate limiting component acts as an intermediary between vehicle providers and backend services. It mediates request flow by selectively allowing or blocking requests based on rate limits, thus protecting backend services from overload while maintaining legitimate service access

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system implements strict rate limiting to prevent overload, then system stability and security are improved, but service accessibility and responsiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidservice accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The rate limiting system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on current system conditions, request characteristics, and provider history. Rather than applying fixed strict limits, the system adapts rate limits in real-time to balance stability maintenance with service accessibility, allowing legitimate requests to pass through while blocking abusive patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the system filters requests based on multiple attributes and criteria, then request prioritization and security are improved, but processing complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest prioritizationVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The request filtering system segments the evaluation process into distinct stages: initial rate limit checking, provider history evaluation, request attribute analysis, and prioritization scoring. This segmentation allows complex multi-attribute filtering to be handled through a series of simpler, modular evaluation steps, reducing processing complexity while maintaining comprehensive security checks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11599839B2Systems and methods for limiting autonomous vehicle requests
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11599839B2 patent drawing
  • US11599839B2 patent drawing
  • US11599839B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for limiting autonomous vehicle requests are provided. The method includes obtaining data indicative of a request for access to a software service for facilitating one or more transportation services. The method can include granting access to the software service based on a rate limit associated with the request and a request history. The rate limit can be associated with any combination of a vehicle provider determined based on the request, the software service for which access is requested, or current data. The rate limit can define a threshold number of requests over a period of time. The method can include determining the routing action for the request based on the rate limit and a request history associated the vehicle provider, the software service, or current data. The routing action can include granting access if the request history is less than the threshold number of requests.