Dynamic Receptacle Rate Matching for Material Handling Bottlenecks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In order fulfillment systems, faster operators are idle due to slower operators' inventory receptacles accumulating and recirculating, causing system bottlenecks and reduced throughput, as the system cannot accommodate varied operator rates without additional capacity.

Innovation Solution

A computer-controlled feedback algorithm adjusts the set-point for inventory receptacles at each processing station, using a dual-loop feedback control to dynamically manage the supply based on actual and desired numbers, ensuring optimal inventory levels and preventing bottlenecks by prioritizing faster operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system supplies inventory receptacles to all processing stations at a uniform rate, then slower operators can keep up with supply, but faster operators become idle and system throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the supply rate adjustable and adaptive rather than fixed. The control system dynamically modifies the supply rate to each processing station based on real-time operator performance data, allowing the system to adapt to varying operator speeds and maintain optimal throughput without sacrificing stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of supply rate from a constant value to a variable that can be adjusted based on operator performance. By modifying this parameter dynamically, the system optimizes throughput for each operator's capability while maintaining overall system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the system increases capacity to accommodate faster operators, then throughput can be maintained at high levels, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem throughputVSAvoidsystem capacity requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring operator performance and using this information to adjust supply rates. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain high throughput for fast operators without requiring additional physical capacity, as the supply is dynamically matched to actual processing needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system serves multiple functions: it monitors operator performance, calculates optimal supply rates, and adjusts delivery timing. This multi-functional approach replaces the need for additional physical capacity with an intelligent control mechanism that handles various operator speeds within the same system infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If inventory receptacles are allowed to accumulate at buffers, then operators can work at their own pace, but recirculation fills the sorter and prevents supply to faster operators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator independenceVSAvoidreceptacle supply efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating and pre-positioning inventory receptacles based on predicted operator needs. Rather than allowing random accumulation and recirculation, the system proactively prepares and delivers the right number of receptacles at the right time, preventing both shortages and excessive accumulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the buffer accumulation level adjustable rather than fixed. The control system dynamically determines the optimal buffer level for each operator based on their performance characteristics, allowing fast operators to have minimal buffer accumulation while slow operators can have larger buffers, thereby preventing sorter congestion while maintaining operator independence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3183191B1Dynamic rate matching for material handling
Publication Date: 2022.04.27 DEMATIC CORP
  • EP3183191B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3183191B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3183191B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

A method and apparatus for supplying a unit of work in a material-handling process includes a set-point of work units desired at a material-processing station and an actual measure of work units at the material-processing station. A feedback control algorithm is performed to establish the set point of work units at the material-processing station and an error between the work units at the material-processing station and the set-point of work units at the material-processing station. The feedback control algorithm also determines a desired amount of units that should be supplied to the material-processing station as a function of the error. The feedback control algorithm causes a work unit to be released from the inventory store for a particular processing station when the actual amount of work units supplied to that processing station is less than the amount of work units that should be supplied to that processing station.