Dynamic Recognition Area Adjustment for Touch Input Error Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touch pad systems are prone to errors due to fixed coordinate recognition, which fails to account for hand gripping type, movement radius, and touching medium, leading to unintended button clicks and incorrect coordinate generation.

Innovation Solution

The input device dynamically reassigned the recognition area based on the size and type of the touch pad, contact location, and user-specific characteristics, using a cell coordinate system with nonuniformly divided cell areas to align with the user's intended coordinates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fixed coordinate recognition is used in touch pad systems, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to coordinate errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordinate recognition systemVSAvoidcoordinate detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic recognition area adjustment by detecting the user's hand gripping position and movement characteristics, then reassigning the recognition area boundaries in real-time. This transforms the static coordinate system into a dynamic one that adapts to user behavior, resolving the contradiction between system simplicity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the recognition area (position, size, shape) based on detected hand gripping characteristics and movement patterns. By dynamically modifying these parameters, the system maintains high coordinate detection accuracy without requiring complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the recognition area is dynamically reassigned based on hand gripping characteristics, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordinate detection accuracyVSAvoidcoordinate recognition system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically detecting hand gripping characteristics and movement patterns, then autonomously reassigning the recognition area without user intervention. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for complex external control systems while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors touch coordinates and movement patterns, compares them against expected ranges, and provides feedback by adjusting the recognition area boundaries. This closed-loop feedback mechanism improves precision while keeping the complexity manageable through iterative adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If fixed coordinate values are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability deteriorates due to unintended button clicks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch pad usabilityVSAvoidinput accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of hand gripping position and movement characteristics before final coordinate recognition. By preparing the recognition area in advance based on predicted user intent, the system prevents unintended button clicks while maintaining natural operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system anticipates potential coordinate errors by detecting hand gripping characteristics and pre-adjusts the recognition area to counteract expected deviations. This preliminary anti-action prevents unintended inputs before they occur, improving reliability without affecting ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentEP2410416B1Input device and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2020.01.22 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • EP2410416B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2410416B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2410416B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A control method includes: receiving a user's input through a touch area of the input device; and recognizing the user's touch input to the touch area through a recognition area of the input device corresponding to the touch area and changing and assigning a range of the recognition area corresponding to the touch area according to a predetermined standard.