Dynamic Flow Area Control in Regulating Ball Valves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Control ball valves with rigid perforated discs face issues with pressure reduction efficiency across varying flow rates, leading to increased wear, noise, and cavitation due to fixed flow areas that decrease quadratically with throughput, necessitating matching to maximum flow rates and resulting in suboptimal performance at lower rates.

Innovation Solution

The control ball valve dynamically adjusts the flow areas of both the regulating and perforated discs by varying the angular position of the valve ball, creating parallel flow chambers with webs that support the discs, allowing the flow-through surface to adapt to flow rates, enabling a multi-stage pressure reduction independent of flow rate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If rigid perforated discs are used with fixed flow areas, then the valve can be matched to maximum flow rates, but pressure reduction efficiency decreases quadratically at lower flow rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure reduction efficiencyVSAvoidflow rate range adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the flow area of the perforated disc dynamic rather than fixed. The flow area changes with the angular position of the valve ball, allowing the system to adapt to different flow rates. When the valve ball rotates, it exposes different portions of the perforated disc, thereby dynamically adjusting the flow area to maintain optimal pressure reduction efficiency across varying flow conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by varying the flow area parameter of the perforated disc based on the valve's operating conditions. As the valve ball angular position changes, the effective flow area through the perforated disc is modified, enabling the system to maintain high pressure reduction efficiency whether operating at full load or part load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If pressure differences are increased to maintain pressure reduction at lower flow rates, then pressure control is improved, but wear and cavitation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control effectivenessVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamics principle is applied by dynamically adjusting the flow area of the perforated disc to match the current flow rate. This ensures that the pressure difference across the disc remains within optimal limits regardless of whether the valve is operating at high or low flow rates, thereby preventing excessive wear and cavitation while maintaining effective pressure control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of high pressure differences at low flow rates into a benefit by using the valve ball's angular position to control the flow area. This prevents the formation of harmful cavitation and reduces wear by ensuring that pressure differences remain within safe limits, turning a potentially damaging condition into a controlled and beneficial operating parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If pressure differences are increased for pressure control, then pressure reduction is improved, but noise emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure reduction capabilityVSAvoidnoise emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the flow area of the perforated disc variable based on the valve ball's angular position. This dynamic adjustment ensures that pressure differences are kept within optimal ranges at all flow rates, preventing the generation of excessive noise while maintaining effective pressure reduction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the flow area parameter of the perforated disc according to the operating conditions. This ensures that the pressure difference parameter remains within limits that prevent noise generation, while still achieving the required pressure reduction effect across the full range of flow rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the flow area of the perforated disc is reduced to maintain pressure reduction at lower flow rates, then pressure control is improved, but the structural design becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure reduction efficiencyVSAvoidflow area adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the universality principle by using the valve ball to perform multiple functions: it controls the main flow path and simultaneously controls the flow area of the perforated disc. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate adjustment mechanisms, maintaining pressure reduction efficiency across different flow rates without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the function of flow area control with the valve ball's primary function of controlling the main flow path. By combining these functions into a single component, the system achieves variable flow area adjustment without adding separate mechanisms, thereby maintaining simplicity while improving pressure reduction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design ensures effective pressure reduction and noise control across a wide range of flow rates, reducing wear and cavitation while maintaining low noise emissions, by dynamically adjusting the flow-through surfaces of the discs based on the valve's angular position, allowing for efficient operation at both full and part load conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the control ball valve is in the closed position after the valve ball has been rotated by 90 degrees, with the flow path between the inlet and outlet being sealed off by the outside of the valve ball

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical sealing:

Implementation Method 2

A multi-stage pressure reduction takes place via the regulating disk and the perforated disk, which serve as throttle points

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrottling:

Implementation Method 3

the problem of cavitation can occur, ie the formation of vapor bubbles when the vapor pressure falls below a certain level, which causes extreme wear damage due to the vapor bubbles imploding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Data Source

PatentEP2690333B1Regulating ball valve
Publication Date: 2016.04.27 ARTES VALVE & SERVICE
  • EP2690333B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2690333B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2690333B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The control valve (1) has a valve housing (2) that is provided with an inlet (3) and an outlet (4) with a vertically rotatable to a flow direction of a valve ball (5). A valve channel (12) is provided between an open and close position in which the inlet and the outlet are fluidly connected and separated from each other. A control disc (9, 14) is adjacent to the valve ball arranged with a perforated disc (16, 17). The flow-through surface of the perforated disc is dependent on the angular position of the valve ball.