Dynamic Regulation Applicability Assessment for Product Protocols

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity and inconsistency of product regulations across different jurisdictions, combined with the lack of consistent product protocols, make it challenging for manufacturers and retailers to accurately determine which regulations apply to new or updated products, leading to inefficiencies and potential non-compliance.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that dynamically assesses the applicability of product regulations to product protocols using machine learning techniques, analyzing product protocol content against stored regulations to identify potentially applicable regulations and presenting the results for user review and adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review methods are used to determine regulation applicability, then entities can identify applicable regulations, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation applicability determination accuracyVSAvoidtime for regulation review
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated machine learning models and natural language processing systems. These systems automatically analyze product protocols against regulation databases, eliminating the need for manual comparison while maintaining or improving determination accuracy through consistent application of regulatory criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated assessment platform that mediates between product protocols and regulations. This platform uses trained machine learning models to bridge the gap between unstructured product information and structured regulatory requirements, providing automated applicability determinations without direct human intervention in the comparison process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive regulation databases are maintained to ensure complete coverage, then all applicable regulations can be identified, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation coverage completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive regulation database into organized categories and hierarchies, allowing the system to manage complexity through structured data organization. The machine learning models are trained on these segmented datasets, enabling them to efficiently query and match regulations without requiring the entire database to be processed simultaneously, thus maintaining reliability while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If product protocols are updated frequently to meet consumer demand, then product competitiveness is maintained, but determining applicable regulations becomes more difficult due to regulation changes during the lead time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct development speedVSAvoidregulation applicability accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic system where the machine learning models are continuously retrained and updated as new regulations are added to the database. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high reliability in regulation applicability determinations even as regulations change frequently, supporting rapid product development without sacrificing accuracy. The system evolves alongside regulatory changes rather than remaining static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12056715B2Technologies for dynamically assessing applicability of product regulations to product protocols
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 UL LLC
  • US12056715B2 patent drawing
  • US12056715B2 patent drawing
  • US12056715B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for dynamically determining potentially applicability of product regulations to product protocols. According to certain aspects, an electronic device may access new or updated product regulations for various jurisdictions as well as product protocols associated with certain products. The electronic device may employ various data analyses technologies to determine which product regulations are potentially applicable to which product protocols. The electronic device may present information associated with the data analyses, and enable users to review information, further assess applicability, and make selections.