Dynamic Product Regulation Classification System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge lies in accurately and efficiently determining the applicability of product regulation updates to product profiles across diverse jurisdictions, where inconsistencies in regulations and product profiles complicate the assessment, leading to manual, time-consuming, and costly processes that often result in non-compliance due to outdated regulatory information.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that dynamically assesses the impact of product regulation updates on product profiles by accessing and analyzing alerts, extracting updates, and using machine learning techniques to align entities and standardize taxonomies, facilitating automatic determination of applicable regulations through a user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual methods are used to determine regulation applicability, then accuracy can be maintained through expert review, but the process becomes time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation applicability assessment accuracyVSAvoidtime required for regulation assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of products into categories and pre-identification of applicable regulations before the actual compliance assessment. This advance preparation reduces the time required for manual expert review while maintaining accuracy, as experts only need to verify pre-identified regulations rather than assess from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated classification system and algorithm act as an intermediary between regulatory texts and product profiles, performing initial matching and assessment. This intermediary handles the time-consuming preliminary work of identifying applicable regulations, allowing human experts to focus on verification and complex cases, thus reducing overall assessment time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive regulation tracking is implemented across all jurisdictions, then compliance coverage is improved, but system complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance coverageVSAvoidregulation tracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of multi-jurisdictional compliance tracking into manageable components: jurisdiction-specific regulation modules, product category classifications, and attribute-based filtering. Each jurisdiction and product category is handled as a separate module, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal classification framework and standardized product profile structure that can accommodate multiple jurisdictions and regulation types. This universal approach allows the same core system to handle diverse regulatory requirements across different regions without requiring completely separate systems for each jurisdiction, thus managing complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If product profiles are updated frequently to reflect new regulations, then compliance currentness is improved, but manufacturing and operational disruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation compliance currentnessVSAvoidproduct manufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic regulation applicability assessment that automatically detects and adapts to regulatory changes without requiring complete re-evaluation of all products. The classification system dynamically updates only the affected product categories and attributes, allowing continuous compliance monitoring with minimal disruption to manufacturing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors regulatory updates, performs impact analysis, and updates product profiles without requiring manual intervention in manufacturing processes. The automated classification and assessment system serves itself by continuously scanning for regulation changes and applying updates only where applicable, maintaining compliance currentness while minimizing operational disruption through self-directed updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230015090A1Systems and Methods for Dynamically Classifying Products and Assessing Applicability of Product Regulations
Publication Date: 2023.01.19 UL LLC
  • US20230015090A1 patent drawing
  • US20230015090A1 patent drawing
  • US20230015090A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for dynamically determining potentially applicability of product regulation updates and regulatory requirement rules and representations to product profiles, as well as map product taxonomies. According to certain aspects, an electronic device may access new or updated product regulation updates for various jurisdictions as well as product profiles associated with certain products. The electronic device may employ various data analysis technologies to determine which product regulation updates are potentially applicable to which product profiles. The electronic device may present information associated with the data analyses, and enable users to review information, further assess applicability, make selections, and interface and integrate with external systems to exchange information and insights.