Dynamic Removal Depth Control for Lathe Chatter Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for avoiding chatter during workpiece turning on a lathe often result in defective products and production delays, as they require shutting down the lathe to adjust settings or change tools, which can lead to cutter breakage and incomplete removal of defects.

Innovation Solution

A chatter avoidance method and device that dynamically adjusts the removal depth of a workpiece based on real-time sensing, starting with a predetermined safe depth and reducing it if chatter is detected, until the minimum depth is determined to prevent continuous chatter and ensure complete removal without shutting down the lathe.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the removal depth is increased to improve productivity, then the production rate increases, but chatter occurs during the turning process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoidchatter
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the removal depth adjustable and variable during the turning process. The system dynamically changes the removal depth based on real-time chatter detection, allowing the process to adapt between aggressive removal (when stable) and conservative removal (when chatter occurs), thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and chatter prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the removal depth parameter in response to chatter conditions. By monitoring vibration signals and adjusting the removal depth parameter accordingly, the system maintains high productivity during stable operation while preventing chatter by reducing removal depth when necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional chatter avoidance methods are applied to stop chatter, then chatter is prevented, but the lathe must be shut down causing production delay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechatter preventionVSAvoidproduction delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuous operation of the lathe by avoiding shutdowns. Instead of stopping the machine to address chatter, the system continuously adjusts the removal depth parameter while the lathe keeps running, ensuring uninterrupted production and eliminating downtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from vibration sensors to detect chatter in real-time and automatically adjusts the removal depth parameter in response. This closed-loop control allows the lathe to continue operating without shutdown while maintaining chatter-free operation through continuous parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the rotating speed or feeding speed is adjusted to avoid chatter, then chatter is prevented, but the cutter may be broken

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechatter preventionVSAvoidcutter integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the removal depth parameter instead of adjusting rotating speed or feeding speed. This alternative parameter adjustment achieves chatter prevention while maintaining safe operating conditions for the cutter, avoiding the risk of cutter breakage associated with speed adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the fixture is fastened or cutter is changed to prevent chatter, then chatter is avoided, but the lathe must be shut down causing production delay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechatter preventionVSAvoidproduction delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous lathe operation by using removable depth adjustment instead of requiring shutdowns for fixture fastening or cutter changes. The useful action of machining continues uninterrupted while the removal depth parameter is dynamically adjusted to prevent chatter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides self-service chatter prevention through automatic detection and adjustment of removal depth based on vibration feedback. This eliminates the need for operator intervention to fasten fixtures or change cutters, allowing continuous operation without production delay

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach prevents continuous chatter, allows for complete removal of defective layers, reduces the risk of cutter breakage, and maintains a desired production rate by dynamically adjusting the removal depth in real-time.

Implementation Method 1

a sensing element configured to sense a chatter when the workpiece is partially removed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration sensing: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS9833868B2Chatter avoidance method and device
Publication Date: 2017.12.05 IND TECH RES INST
  • US9833868B2 patent drawing
  • US9833868B2 patent drawing
  • US9833868B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chatter avoidance method and device is provided, including steps of: providing a stable operating condition plot; partially removing a first layer of a workpiece with a predetermined first removal depth according to a safe removal depth of the stable operating condition plot and sensing a chatter caused by the removal operation; if no chatter is sensed, completing the removal operation, otherwise, continuing to partially remove the first layer with a second removal depth less than the predetermined first removal depth; and determining a minimum removal depth according to the removal operation, and removing a last layer of the workpiece with a last removal depth less than or equal to the minimum removal depth, allowing the workpiece to have a target thickness. The disclosure prevents a chatter from continuously occurring without requiring a shut-down and thereby maintains a desired production rate.