Dynamic Repetition for Uplink Control Channel Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in ensuring reliable reception of uplink control channel information due to interference and coverage quality issues, particularly for short control channels like the physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), leading to potential interruptions in data communication.

Innovation Solution

Implementing dynamic repetition techniques for the uplink control channel, where user equipment (UE) repeats the transmission of control channel information based on received instructions, increasing transmission energy and improving signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the base station, thereby ensuring uninterrupted data communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dynamic repetition is implemented for uplink control channel, then reception energy and reliability are improved, but transmission time and resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic repetition by allowing the base station to configure different repetition factors (K1, K2, K3) based on current channel conditions, UE capability, and traffic requirements. The repetition count is not fixed but adapts dynamically through RRC signaling, enabling the system to optimize between reliability and time loss in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of repetition factor from a static value to a dynamically configurable parameter. The base station can adjust the repetition count (K1 for first repetition, K2 for second repetition, K3 for third repetition) based on SINR conditions, UE capability indicators, and network requirements, thereby optimizing the trade-off between reception reliability and transmission time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple repetition transmissions are performed, then signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio is improved, but uplink resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioVSAvoiduplink resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial repetition by transmitting the uplink control channel information K times (where K ≥ 1) instead of always transmitting the maximum possible repetitions. The base station configures the optimal repetition count based on current channel conditions, UE capability, and network requirements, avoiding unnecessary resource consumption when full repetition is not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The repetition factor is dynamically adjusted based on UE capability indicators and channel conditions. The UE reports its capability (maximum supported repetition count), and the base station determines the actual repetition count (K1, K2, K3) to balance SINR improvement with resource conservation, preventing excessive energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If repetition factor is increased beyond UE capability, then reception reliability improves, but UE processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception reliabilityVSAvoidUE processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the UE reports its capability indicator (maximum supported repetition count) to the base station. The base station uses this feedback to configure appropriate repetition factors that do not exceed UE capabilities, preventing excessive processing complexity while maintaining adequate reliability through dynamic adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the repetition factor parameter based on UE capability feedback. The base station configures K1, K2, K3 values that are tailored to each UE's processing capabilities, ensuring that repetition is applied at levels the UE can handle without excessive complexity while still achieving the desired reliability improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20220124702A1Dynamic repetition for a control channel
Publication Date: 2022.04.21 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20220124702A1 patent drawing
  • US20220124702A1 patent drawing
  • US20220124702A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a user equipment (UE) may receive, from a transmitter, information regarding repeating a communication associated with an uplink control channel. The UE may transmit the communication associated with the uplink control channel based at least in part on the information. Numerous other aspects are provided.