Dynamic Resource Allocation for Service Clusters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in optimally allocating dynamic resources across clusters to meet fluctuating service demand, leading to sub-optimal utilization and inefficiencies due to uneven distribution and frequent re-allocation, which results in downtime and excessive network bandwidth usage from unnecessary notifications.

Innovation Solution

A management system that employs a staged approach for resource allocation and re-allocation, considering forecasted demand, resource availability, and current utilization, minimizing re-allocations and optimizing resource distribution across clusters while providing targeted notifications to client devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If resources are allocated based on specific distribution in each cluster to handle uneven demand, then demand satisfaction in high-demand clusters is improved, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates due to idle resources in low-demand clusters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand satisfactionVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation where resources are not statically assigned to specific clusters but can be moved between clusters based on real-time demand conditions. The system continuously monitors demand across clusters and reallocates resources dynamically, allowing the same resource to serve different clusters at different times, thus eliminating idle resources while maintaining demand satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If resources are uniformly distributed across clusters, then resource utilization efficiency is improved, but demand satisfaction deteriorates in high-demand clusters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoiddemand satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring demand conditions in each cluster and using this information to make reallocation decisions. The feedback loop allows the system to detect when demand exceeds supply in any cluster and trigger appropriate resource movements, ensuring both efficient utilization and adequate demand satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If frequent re-allocation is performed to adapt to dynamic demand, then demand satisfaction is improved, but system downtime increases due to repeated resource transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand satisfactionVSAvoidsystem downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively moving resources before demand peaks occur, based on predictive analytics and historical patterns. By anticipating future demand conditions and pre-positioning resources accordingly, the system avoids last-minute frantic reallocations that would cause significant downtime, thus maintaining demand satisfaction while minimizing disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If too many notifications are transmitted about redistributions, then client device responsiveness is improved, but network bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclient device responsivenessVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by customizing notification behavior based on specific conditions and recipients. Not all client devices receive all notifications about resource redistributions - instead, notifications are selectively sent only when relevant to specific clusters or clients, and only when the redistribution actually impacts their service experience. This selective approach maintains responsiveness where needed while conserving network bandwidth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10142255B1Allocating dynamic resources to service clusters
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10142255B1 patent drawing
  • US10142255B1 patent drawing
  • US10142255B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for efficiently managing resources are described. In an example, a computer system may access a forecast for demand associated with utilizing a service during a time period, where the service is available from service sources grouped in clusters. The computer system may identify resources scheduled to facilitate the service. Based on a scheduled start time for utilizing a resource, the forecast, and an allocation of remaining resources to the clusters, the computer system may allocate the resource to a first cluster and may provide a notification about the allocation to an associated client device. At a subsequent time during the time period, the computer system may re-allocate the resource to a second cluster based on a current utilization of the resource, an update to the forecast, and the allocation of the remaining resources. A respective notification may be provided to the client device.