Dynamic Resource Analysis Machine for Complex Task Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge lies in effectively finding, evaluating, and allocating the right resources for complex tasks across geographically distributed networks, as existing technologies face difficulties in efficiently identifying and allocating resources to ensure successful task execution.

Innovation Solution

The Dynamic Resource Analysis Machine (DRAM) implements a multi-dimensional assessment system that evaluates resources using tailored dimensions and metrics, facilitating the selection of appropriate resources by performing complex assessments across various types, including software, AI engines, robots, and human workers, through a global network architecture that connects data platforms and assessment engines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a comprehensive multi-dimensional assessment system is implemented to evaluate resources accurately, then resource selection precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource selection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assessment system is divided into multiple independent dimensions (task dimension, resource dimension, controller dimension, team dimension, goal dimension), each with specific metrics. This segmentation allows complex resource evaluation to be broken down into manageable components that can be assessed separately and then combined, reducing the complexity of implementing and maintaining the overall system while maintaining comprehensive evaluation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The DRAM framework provides a universal assessment mechanism that can evaluate different types of resources (software, hardware, human workers, AI engines) using the same multi-dimensional structure. This multi-functionality reduces system complexity by using a single framework for diverse evaluation needs rather than requiring separate specialized systems for each resource type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Quantity of substance

If geographically distributed resource identification and evaluation is expanded to increase resource pool, then resource availability is improved, but evaluation efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource pool sizeVSAvoidevaluation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where resources provide information about their capabilities, availability, and performance history. This feedback allows the DRAM to efficiently evaluate and rank resources without requiring exhaustive manual assessment of each resource, thereby maintaining high evaluation efficiency even as the geographically distributed resource pool expands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The DRAM framework acts as an intermediary between resource providers and task requirements, automatically matching resources to tasks based on the multi-dimensional assessment. This intermediary function eliminates the need for direct manual evaluation of each resource against every task requirement, significantly improving evaluation efficiency while supporting large-scale geographically distributed resource pools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If complex multi-dimensional assessments are performed to improve resource allocation accuracy, then task completion success rate is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion success rateVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing the multi-dimensional assessment framework and metrics before actual resource evaluation is needed. The framework structure, dimension definitions, and evaluation criteria are prepared in advance, allowing rapid execution of assessments when resources need to be evaluated for specific tasks, thereby reducing processing time while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The framework allows dynamic adjustment of assessment parameters and dimension weights based on specific task requirements and resource characteristics. This parameter flexibility enables the system to optimize the balance between assessment thoroughness and processing speed by adjusting which dimensions are evaluated and their relative importance for each specific evaluation scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10412024B2Resource evaluation for complex task execution
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US10412024B2 patent drawing
  • US10412024B2 patent drawing
  • US10412024B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The global proliferation of high speed communication networks has created unprecedented opportunities for geographically distributed resource identification, evaluation, selection, and allocation. However, while the opportunities exist and continue to grow, the realization of those opportunities has fallen behind. A dynamic resource assessment system helps to solve the enormous technical challenges of finding the resources, evaluating the resources, and determining how to allocate the resources to achieve the highest likelihood of successfully completing the task.