Dynamic Resource Scaling for Content Delivery Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Content delivery networks face challenges in managing sudden increases in requests, leading to cache misses and degraded performance, as existing solutions require constant resource allocation and may introduce additional failure points.

Innovation Solution

The system analyzes log data from content delivery edges to determine cache hit/miss rates and uses machine learning to predict future increases in demand, automatically scaling resources dedicated to serving content by instructing origin servers to adjust compute resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If constant resource allocation is used to handle sudden increases in requests, then content delivery reliability is improved, but resource waste increases and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent delivery reliabilityVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation by continuously monitoring cache hit/miss rates and automatically scaling compute resources at origin servers based on actual demand. This replaces static constant resource allocation with a dynamic system that adjusts resources in real-time, improving reliability during demand spikes while avoiding resource waste during low-demand periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by analyzing log data from content delivery edges to determine cache hit/miss rates, then using this feedback to automatically scale resources at origin servers. This closed-loop control ensures resources are allocated based on actual performance metrics, resolving the contradiction between maintaining reliability and avoiding resource waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If additional resources are allocated to handle demand spikes, then content delivery performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent delivery performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service automation where the system automatically monitors cache performance metrics and scales resources without human intervention. This automation reduces operational complexity while maintaining improved content delivery performance during demand spikes, as the system manages its own resource allocation dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of cache hit/miss rates and predicts future demand patterns, allowing resources to be allocated in advance of actual demand spikes. This proactive approach improves content delivery performance while managing complexity through automated prediction and planning rather than reactive manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If manual resource management is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but response time to demand changes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidresponse time to demand changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical resource management processes with automated computational systems that continuously monitor cache performance and automatically scale resources. This substitution eliminates the time delay associated with manual intervention while managing complexity through standardized automated procedures and algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes resource allocation parameters based on monitored cache hit/miss rates and demand patterns. This dynamic parameter adjustment enables rapid response to demand changes while maintaining simplicity through automated rule-based control rather than complex manual decision-making processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of energy

If resources are scaled down to reduce costs, then resource efficiency is improved, but content delivery reliability deteriorates during demand spikes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidcontent delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic monitoring and adjustment of resource allocation based on cache performance metrics. Resources are scaled down during low-demand periods to improve efficiency, then automatically scaled up during demand spikes to maintain reliability. This periodic rhythm of adjustment resolves the contradiction by timing resource allocation to match actual demand patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts resource allocation levels based on real-time cache hit/miss rate analysis, transitioning between scaled-down efficient states and scaled-up reliable states as demand conditions change. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to optimize for efficiency during normal operation while ensuring reliability is maintained during demand spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11616991B1Automatically serving different versions of content responsive to client device rendering errors
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11616991B1 patent drawing
  • US11616991B1 patent drawing
  • US11616991B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, a system is provided, and computer-executable instructions cause the system to: obtain, at an edge server of a content delivery network, a request for a content item from a client device; determine that the there are multiple versions of the first content item that require varying amount of resources to serve including a first version, and a second version requiring more resources to serve than the first version; select the second version; send the second version; determine that the client device is not properly rendering the second version of the content item; and in response to determining that that the client device is not properly rendering the second version, send the first version.