Dynamic Respiratory Pressure Control for Obesity Hypoventilation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for treating respiratory disorders, such as Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome, fail to dynamically adjust therapeutic respiratory rate and tidal volume based on a subject's spontaneous breathing efforts, often supporting both spontaneous and non-spontaneous breaths at the same pressure levels, which can lead to inadequate respiratory support.

Innovation Solution

A therapy system comprising a pressure generator, sensors, and processors that dynamically control the delivery of pressurized breathable gas, adjusting inspiratory and expiratory pressures to maintain a therapeutic respiratory rate and target tidal volume, distinguishing between spontaneous and non-spontaneous breaths to provide tailored respiratory support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional systems deliver pressurized gas at fixed pressure levels for all breaths, then device complexity is reduced, but respiratory support adequacy deteriorates because spontaneous and non-spontaneous breaths are not differentiated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverespiratory support adequacyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts inspiratory pressure levels based on real-time detection of spontaneous versus non-spontaneous breaths. The control system transitions from fixed pressure delivery to adaptive pressure modulation, where spontaneous breaths receive lower pressure support and non-spontaneous breaths receive higher pressure support, optimizing respiratory assistance while responding to changing patient needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor respiratory effort and breath characteristics. Sensors detect whether each breath is spontaneous or non-spontaneous, and this information feeds back to the control module which adjusts the pressure delivery accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures adequate respiratory support while adapting to the patient's actual breathing patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If therapeutic respiratory rate is set by user configuration, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates because the system cannot respond to spontaneous respiration measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to spontaneous respirationVSAvoiduser configuration requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment of respiratory rate parameters by automatically detecting and analyzing the patient's spontaneous breathing patterns. The control module uses measured spontaneous respiration data to dynamically determine the therapeutic respiratory rate, eliminating the need for manual user configuration and ensuring the therapy adapts to the patient's actual physiological state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The respiratory rate control transitions from a static user-defined setting to a dynamic parameter that automatically adjusts based on real-time measurement of spontaneous respiration. The system continuously monitors breath characteristics and modifies the therapeutic respiratory rate to match the patient's natural breathing rhythm and metabolic needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If every breath is supported at the same pressure levels, then device complexity is reduced, but respiratory efficiency deteriorates because spontaneous and non-spontaneous breaths require different pressure support

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverespiratory efficiencyVSAvoidpressure control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different pressure support levels to different types of breaths based on their characteristics. Spontaneous breaths receive a lower inspiratory pressure level appropriate for patient-initiated respiration, while non-spontaneous breaths receive a higher pressure level to ensure adequate ventilation. This localized differentiation of pressure support optimizes respiratory efficiency by matching pressure assistance to actual breathing effort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control system segments breaths into distinct categories (spontaneous versus non-spontaneous) and applies different pressure control strategies to each segment. This segmentation allows the system to optimize pressure support for each breath type independently, improving overall respiratory efficiency while maintaining manageable control complexity through clear classification and differentiated response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2643040B1Obesity hypoventilation syndrome treatment system and method
Publication Date: 2017.08.09 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP2643040B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2643040B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2643040B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A pressurized flow of breathable gas is delivered to the airway of a subject in accordance with a therapy regimen. The therapy regimen calls for maintenance of an average tidal volume. The therapy ensures that the subject breaths at a therapeutic breath rate. The breath rate may be determined dynamically based on breathing of the subject early on in a therapy session and/or based on a detected wakefulness of the subject. Inspiration for spontaneous and non-spontaneous breaths may be supported at different levels. The therapy regimen further maintains a beneficial positive end expiratory pressure, to reduce respiratory obstructions and/or for other purposes.