Dynamic Retaining Barrier for 3D Printing Volume and Waste

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D printing technologies using powdered substrates face limitations due to fixed build box sizes, leading to material waste and restricted part size, as well as constraints on the rate of strength development of the build material, which can result in inadequate bonding between layers or distortion of parts during the printing process.

Innovation Solution

A dynamically adjustable retaining barrier that expands the working volume during the 3D printing process, allowing for variable receiving volumes and enabling the use of different hardening materials with spatial gradients to optimize the hardening rate of the printed components, thereby reducing material waste and improving part stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of stationary object

If a fixed-size build box is used to contain powder material, then the machine structure is simple and reliable, but the receiving volume is fixed leading to material waste and limited part size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiving volumeVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by transforming the static build box into a dynamic system where the receiving volume can be adjusted during the printing process. The build box expands vertically as layers are deposited, allowing the receiving volume to adapt to the growing part rather than being fixed from the beginning. This eliminates wasted space and allows for larger part construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The build box is segmented into a stationary base portion and a movable expandable portion. The base provides structural support while the expandable portion can be raised incrementally to increase the receiving volume as needed during the printing process, resolving the contradiction between fixed structure and variable volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Volume of moving object

If the build box volume is increased to accommodate larger parts, then part size is no longer limited, but the amount of powder material required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart sizeVSAvoidpowder material
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The build box volume dynamically adapts to the actual part size being constructed rather than being predetermined. The expandable portion rises incrementally with each layer deposition, maintaining a compact footprint while accommodating large parts. This ensures powder is only used where needed for actual part construction, not to fill a large fixed volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The expandable portion of the build box is positioned locally around the growing part, providing containment only where powder material is actually deposited. This localized approach minimizes the total quantity of powder required while still enabling large part construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Duration of action of stationary object

If a fast-hardening material is used to provide immediate support, then the retaining barrier can be erected early, but the bonding between layers may be too rapid causing distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardening timeVSAvoidbonding quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a spatial gradient in the hardening process. The build material exhibits position-dependent hardening rates, with faster hardening at the periphery where the retaining barrier contacts the powder, and slower hardening in the interior regions. This localized control allows the barrier to form early for support while preventing excessive hardening forces that would cause distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The hardening parameters of the build material are changed spatially to create different hardening rates in different regions. This parameter variation allows the material to provide immediate support near the barrier while maintaining flexibility and bonding quality in the bulk material, resolving the contradiction between fast support formation and distortion-free bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10632732B2Method and apparatus for making three-dimensional objects using a dynamically adjustable retaining barrier
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 3DBOTICS INC
  • US10632732B2 patent drawing
  • US10632732B2 patent drawing
  • US10632732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses for making three-dimensional objects from a bindable powder are shown and described. A dynamically erected and/or expanded retaining barrier is provided which is erected and/or expanded during an object building operation to retain dispensed powder.