Dynamic Return Policy Generation for E-Commerce Platforms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

E-commerce platforms face high product return rates due to customers' inability to assess products before purchase, leading to increased environmental impact and costs, as well as waste from unsold returned items.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that dynamically generates a customized return policy based on purchaser return history and product-specific data, allowing for staged fulfillment and modified return rules, such as splitting orders and adjusting refund options, to reduce unnecessary returns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a standard return policy is applied to all customers, then the policy is simple to implement, but it cannot account for individual customer behavior patterns leading to higher return rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn policy customizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The return policy is made dynamic by automatically adjusting return eligibility, refund options, and shipping costs based on real-time analysis of customer purchase history, product category, and calculated return probability. The system transitions from static universal policies to adaptive personalized policies that evolve with customer behavior patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies key return policy parameters including return window duration, refund amount, shipping cost responsibility, and restocking fees based on calculated return probability scores. Different parameter combinations are applied to different customer-product scenarios to optimize both customer satisfaction and merchant profitability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If free returns are offered to all customers, then customer satisfaction is improved, but shipping costs and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer convenienceVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The return policy applies different quality levels locally to different customer-product combinations. High return probability scenarios receive more restrictive policies with higher customer costs, while low return probability scenarios receive generous free return treatment. This localized differentiation optimizes the balance between convenience and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from actual return data and purchase history to continuously refine return probability calculations. This feedback loop enables the system to learn customer behavior patterns and adjust policy parameters to better predict and prevent unnecessary returns while maintaining customer satisfaction for legitimate purchases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If return policies are customized for each customer, then return rates are reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn reduction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of customer purchase history and product characteristics before the purchase occurs to calculate return probability scores. This advance preparation enables customized return policies to be automatically applied at checkout without requiring complex real-time processing during the return event itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically generates and applies customized return policies without requiring manual intervention from either customer or merchant. The automated algorithm processes purchase history, applies business rules, and configures return parameters automatically, reducing operational complexity despite the sophistication of the customization logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Speed

If products are shipped directly to customers without assessment opportunity, then fulfillment speed is improved, but product suitability decreases leading to higher returns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefulfillment speedVSAvoidproduct suitability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of product suitability using AI algorithms that analyze product descriptions, customer profiles, purchase history, and product reviews before the product is shipped. This predictive assessment identifies potential mismatches between product and customer needs, enabling preventive measures to improve suitability without slowing down the physical fulfillment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11657444B2Methods and systems for generating a customized return policy
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 SHOPIFY INC
  • US11657444B2 patent drawing
  • US11657444B2 patent drawing
  • US11657444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods to improve an e-commerce platform through modifications to the checkout and fulfillment process aimed at reducing the incidence of returns. Modifications may include determining a likelihood of a return and, based on the likelihood of return, generating a staged fulfillment process in which an order is split in two linked orders that are processed serially and based on receipt of confirmation to proceed after delivery of a first one of the orders. Modifications may include determining during the checkout process that a custom return policy is to be used and generating the custom return policy based, at least in part, on one or more of a purchaser return history, the product item or items in the order, and product return history.