Dynamic Return Privileges System for Retail Fraud Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In retail environments, existing return policies lack flexibility and effectiveness in preventing return fraud, as they often rely on binary decisions and do not adapt to customer behavior or product attributes, leading to potential abuse and complexity in return processes.

Innovation Solution

A point of return device system that gathers information on return requests and customer history to determine return authorization decisions based on item-level, customer-specific, and registry-related return privileges, using configurable rules that adapt to changing business conditions and customer behavior, thereby reducing fraudulent returns while simplifying the return process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional binary return policies are used, then the return process is simple to implement, but the system cannot adapt to customer behavior or prevent return fraud effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to customer behaviorVSAvoidcomplexity of return policy system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The return policy system transitions from static binary decisions to dynamic multi-level authorization that adapts to customer behavior patterns. The system continuously evaluates customer-specific return privileges based on historical transaction data, creating a dynamic policy framework that adjusts return authorization based on individual customer risk profiles and behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The return policy is segmented into multiple hierarchical levels: item-level return policy, customer-specific return privileges, and registry-related return privileges. This segmentation allows each layer to address specific aspects of return authorization independently, enabling adaptability without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If dynamic multi-level return authorization is implemented, then return fraud is reduced and customer experience is enhanced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness in preventing return fraudVSAvoidcomplexity of authorization system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor customer transaction history and return patterns. Historical transaction data is fed back into the authorization process to dynamically adjust customer-specific return privileges, improving fraud detection accuracy while maintaining systematic control over complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary authorization framework that mediates between simple item-level policies and complex customer behavior analysis. This intermediary layer processes return requests through multiple privilege levels, preventing fraud through systematic evaluation without requiring the entire system to be equally complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If multiple return privilege levels are evaluated, then legitimate returns are better authorized, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of return authorizationVSAvoidprocessing time for return requests
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing customer-specific return privileges and registry-related return privileges before actual return transactions occur. Historical transaction data is analyzed in advance to set appropriate authorization levels, so that during the return process, the system only needs to evaluate predefined privilege levels rather than analyzing complete transaction histories in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10497000B1Dynamic return privileges
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US10497000B1 patent drawing
  • US10497000B1 patent drawing
  • US10497000B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a point of return device can be configured to gather information related to a return request and a returning customer. Upon providing the information to an authorization server, the server can identify historical transaction data of the returning customer from data stored in a repository. Based on the historical transaction data and on the return request, the authorization server determines a return authorization decision based on an item-level return policy, another decision based on customer-specific return privileges, and optionally, another authorization decision based on registry-related return privileges. Upon processing the return request based on a selected return authorization decision, data representative of the processed return request is optionally stored in the repository to update the previously identified customer transaction data.