Dynamic Reward Value Determination in Gaming Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Class II gaming systems face limitations in expansion due to regulatory constraints and offer static gameplay experiences, requiring innovative solutions to enhance variability and enjoyment without increasing processing requirements.

Innovation Solution

A gaming system comprising gameplay stations and a server that dynamically determines reward values based on a wager pot processing system, allowing for dynamic award levels and varied gameplay experiences through a local communication interface, enabling new forms of gameplay while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional gaming machines are used, then regulatory compliance is maintained, but gameplay variability and player engagement are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegameplay variabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making award levels dynamic rather than static. The system automatically adjusts award levels based on real-time wager pot pool values, creating varying reward structures that adapt to current gaming conditions. This dynamic adjustment mechanism increases gameplay variability and player engagement without requiring complex manual reconfiguration of the gaming system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of award levels from fixed values to variable values that fluctuate with wager pot pool amounts. By implementing automatic award level adjustments based on wager pot pool thresholds, the system creates dynamic reward structures that respond to real-time gaming activity, enhancing gameplay variability while maintaining regulatory compliance through automated rather than manual changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If dynamic award levels are implemented, then player engagement is improved, but processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayer engagementVSAvoidprocessing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically adjusting award levels based on predefined thresholds and real-time wager pot pool values. The gaming system autonomously evaluates wager pot pool amounts and applies appropriate award levels without requiring external intervention or complex processing algorithms. This self-adjusting mechanism improves player engagement through dynamic rewards while minimizing processing requirements by using straightforward threshold-based logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring wager pot pool values and using this information to automatically adjust award levels. The system receives feedback on wager pot pool status and responds by applying appropriate award level thresholds, creating a closed-loop control mechanism. This feedback-driven approach enhances player engagement through adaptive rewards while keeping processing requirements manageable through automated threshold evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If new gameplay forms are created, then player interest is stimulated, but regulatory compliance becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegameplay innovationVSAvoidregulatory compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics to maintain regulatory compliance while enabling gameplay innovation by making award levels dynamically adjustable. The system can automatically modify reward structures in response to wager pot pool values, allowing for innovative gameplay variations without requiring changes to the fundamental regulatory framework. This dynamic adaptability enables new gameplay forms to emerge through automated award level adjustments while maintaining compliance with existing regulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250006003A1Method and system for conducting wagering
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 CASTLE ISLAND IP HOLDING LLC
  • US20250006003A1 patent drawing
  • US20250006003A1 patent drawing
  • US20250006003A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved gaming systems, machines, and methods are provided enabling variable gameplay using variable and/or dynamic reward values. The gaming system includes at least a gaming server and one or more gameplay stations, the gaming server determining a reward value in response to receiving a gameplay request and evaluating an award level of the gameplay request based on a wager pot processing system, the reward value including at least a dynamic value based on a wager pot pool.