Dynamic Risk Assessment System for Event-Driven Governance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computational techniques fail to effectively manage risk as a continuous variable in complex systems, leading to sub-optimal outcomes due to static risk assessments and inability to update likelihoods of probabilistic events in real-time, particularly in industrial and financial processes.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses machine learning to dynamically assess and manage risk by processing interaction-event records, assigning event-risk scores based on both past and future events, and continuously updating risk models to predict future risks and optimize decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If static risk assessment methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but predictive accuracy and real-time risk management capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic risk assessment by continuously updating risk scores as new events occur in the time series data. The system transitions from static to dynamic evaluation, where risk assessments are recalculated in real-time based on incoming events, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where risk assessment outcomes influence subsequent monitoring and control actions. The continuous stochastic process controller uses the calculated risk scores to adjust control parameters, creating a closed-loop system that improves predictive accuracy through iterative refinement while the automation reduces the perceived complexity for operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time dynamic risk assessment is implemented, then predictive accuracy and risk management capability improve, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk management capabilityVSAvoidcomputational requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining event types, risk models, and control strategies before real-time operation. The continuous stochastic process controller is pre-configured with the mathematical models and parameters needed for risk assessment, allowing it to process incoming events efficiently without requiring complex real-time calculations for every decision, thus reducing computational burden while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by transitioning from discrete, periodic risk assessments to continuous real-time evaluation. The system adjusts the frequency and granularity of risk calculations based on the stochastic nature of the process, computing risk scores at intervals optimized for both reliability and computational efficiency, thereby balancing risk management capability with resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If continuous stochastic process monitoring is performed, then risk detection capability improves, but data processing complexity and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk detection capabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential features and events from the continuous time series data that are relevant to risk assessment. The continuous stochastic process controller identifies and extracts key events that indicate changes in process state or risk conditions, filtering out redundant information. This extraction approach improves risk detection capability by focusing on critical data points while reducing the overall data processing complexity and storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11941691B2Dynamic business governance based on events
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 CEREBRI AI INC
  • US11941691B2 patent drawing
  • US11941691B2 patent drawing
  • US11941691B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is process, including: obtaining interaction-event records; determining, based on at least some of the interaction-event records, sets of event-risk scores, wherein: at least some respective event-risk scores are indicative of an effective of a respective risk ascribed by a first entity to a respective aspect of a second entity; and at least some respective event-risk scores are based on both: respective contributions of respective corresponding events to a subsequent event, and a risk ascribed to a subsequent event; and storing the sets of event-risk scores in memory.