Dynamic Risk Forecasting via Network Signal Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional risk forecasting techniques are inadequate for managing third-party disruptions in global supply chains due to information overload and lack of contextual analysis, leading to desensitization and ineffective risk management.

Innovation Solution

A computerized network map-based risk model that analyzes correlated risk factors using dynamic signal processing to forecast potential disruptions by determining risk score levels and vulnerability scores in real-time, considering geopolitical and operational factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional monitoring techniques are used to track third-party risks, then organizations can identify potential disruptions, but information overload and lack of contextual analysis lead to desensitization and ineffective risk management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual analysisVSAvoidrisk management effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments risk information into structured categories (geopolitical risks, infrastructure risks, financial risks, etc.) with hierarchical levels (region, country, third-party). This segmentation organizes the overwhelming volume of risk data into manageable, contextually-analyzed units that can be processed effectively, preventing information overload while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer between raw risk data and decision-makers. This layer includes automated analysis engines, contextualization modules, and filtering mechanisms that process, contextualize, and prioritize risk information before presentation, transforming raw data into actionable insights and preventing desensitization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If retroactive analysis techniques are used for third-party risk management, then organizations can make adjustments to procurement relationships, but the global nature and speed of business make these techniques less effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidrisk management reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by continuously monitoring and analyzing risk factors before disruptions occur. The system establishes baseline risk levels, identifies emerging risks through real-time data collection, and generates early warnings, enabling organizations to take preventive measures rather than reactive adjustments, thus maintaining both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms static, retroactive risk analysis into a dynamic, real-time system. The monitoring architecture continuously updates risk assessments, adjusts baseline levels, and adapts to changing conditions, enabling timely responses to global disruptions while maintaining analytical rigor through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If organizations monitor events without additional context or analysis, then they receive alerts about weather events, accidents, or criminal acts, but the alerts become noise and organizations become desensitized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert processing efficiencyVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts relevant signals from noise by applying contextualization rules, correlation analysis, and threshold-based filtering. The system identifies which events constitute actual risks versus routine occurrences, extracting only the meaningful signals that require attention while filtering out noise, thereby maintaining high alert processing efficiency without desensitization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by transforming raw event data into contextualized risk assessments with multiple dimensions (risk level, impact scope, time sensitivity, correlation with other risks). This parameter transformation converts undifferentiated alerts into prioritized, actionable intelligence, maintaining signal-to-noise ratio while improving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If risk managers manually identify risks from multiple factors, then they can assess financial, operational, and external risks, but the complexity and scale of global supply chains make comprehensive monitoring difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal monitoring architecture that handles multiple risk types (geopolitical, infrastructure, financial, operational) through a single integrated system. The platform uses standardized data collection methods, unified analysis frameworks, and consistent reporting mechanisms across all risk categories, enabling comprehensive monitoring of complex global supply chains while managing system complexity through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where risk assessments inform monitoring priorities, which in turn refine risk models. The system learns from identified risks, adjusts baseline levels, and improves detection algorithms, enabling accurate risk assessment across complex supply chains while managing complexity through adaptive, self-improving processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10339484B2System and method for performing signal processing and dynamic analysis and forecasting of risk of third parties
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 KPMG LLP
  • US10339484B2 patent drawing
  • US10339484B2 patent drawing
  • US10339484B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and process for forecasting third party disruption that uses a complex computerized network map as part of a risk model may be used to analyze risk for third parties. A number of risk factors or nodes of the map may include a wide range of risks (e.g., corruption) that have an impact on third parties in a geographic region. A baseline risk level may be established by scoring underlying risk measures for respective geographic regions. By executing the risk model using dynamic signal processing in a near real-time manner and considering impact, velocity, likelihood, and interconnectedness of risk factors and the diffusion of risk across a network, potential third party disruption and/or vulnerability can be forecasted.