Dynamic Route Adjustment for Public Transit Dissatisfaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Public transportation systems face user dissatisfaction due to inefficiencies such as rigid schedules, inconveniently located stations, long waiting times, and uncoordinated transfers, which are exacerbated by increasing population density and the need for network optimization to reduce pollution and fossil fuel dependence.

Innovation Solution

A method involving sensor monitoring to collect data on transportation routes, generating graphs with nodes representing stops and associated densities and leaving rates, comparing these against predetermined thresholds to determine user dissatisfaction levels, and generating outputs to identify and address these issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If public transportation operates on fixed routes and schedules, then operational simplicity is maintained, but user satisfaction deteriorates due to inability to adapt to changing demand and conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user demandVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic route adjustment where transportation paths are continuously modified based on real-time sensor data about passenger density, traffic conditions, and demand patterns. The system transitions from static fixed routes to dynamic adaptive routes that automatically reconfigure to optimize service quality while maintaining operational feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs continuous feedback loops using sensors distributed throughout the transportation network to monitor passenger flow, vehicle occupancy, and route performance. This feedback is processed to automatically adjust routing decisions, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to changing conditions while managing complexity through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If more sensors and monitoring equipment are deployed to collect route information, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute data accuracyVSAvoidsensor network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs multi-functional sensor nodes that simultaneously perform multiple tasks: collecting passenger density data, tracking vehicle location, monitoring traffic conditions, and communicating with central and decentralized control systems. This universal approach maximizes measurement precision while minimizing the number of separate devices needed, thereby controlling system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges sensing, processing, and communication functions into integrated smart nodes distributed throughout the transportation network. By combining multiple functions into unified components, the system achieves high measurement precision without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10546307B2Method, apparatuses, and computer program products for automatically detecting levels of user dissatisfaction with transportation routes
Publication Date: 2020.01.28 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10546307B2 patent drawing
  • US10546307B2 patent drawing
  • US10546307B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aspect of this invention is a method that includes monitoring sensors to collect information for a transportation route, and generating a graph from the collected information where the graph includes a plurality of nodes, each node representing a stop on the at least one transportation route. Each of respective nodes is associated with a corresponding transportation stop density and a corresponding passenger leaving rate. The corresponding transportation stop density is compared with at least one predetermined density threshold and the corresponding passenger leaving rate is compared with at least one predetermined leaving rate threshold to determine a level of dissatisfaction for each of the respective nodes. A tangible output is generated that identifies a level of user dissatisfaction for each of the plurality of nodes.