Dynamic Route Optimization for Waste Collection Fleets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for optimizing waste and recycling vehicle routes are ineffective in minimizing route overlapping and managing daily workloads, leading to inefficient service operations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize United States census tract data to develop optimal routes by determining representing stops at census tract centroids, adding stops based on fullness criteria, and incorporating real-time route conditions to balance and compact routes, minimizing overlaps and optimizing vehicle workloads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional settled routes are used for waste collection, then service coverage is maintained, but route overlapping increases and operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidroute overlapping time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically optimizes routes by processing multiple possible routes for each service area and selecting the best combination that minimizes overlapping. Routes are not fixed but adjusted based on real-time calculations of route fullness criteria, service vehicle availability, and geographic boundaries, transforming static settled routes into dynamic optimized paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key route parameters such as route sequences, service area assignments, and vehicle allocations to eliminate overlapping. By varying these parameters across multiple route options and selecting combinations that satisfy fullness criteria while minimizing overlap, the system achieves reduced route overlapping and improved operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If more service vehicles are deployed, then service coverage increases, but route management complexity and coordination difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverage areaVSAvoidroute management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the service area into multiple defined service areas with geographic boundaries, and assigns different service vehicles to different segments. Each vehicle operates within its assigned service area with optimized routes, reducing coordination complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage through the collective operation of multiple segmented routes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The route optimization system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it optimizes routes for multiple vehicles, ensures balanced workloads, minimizes overlapping, and maintains service coverage. This multi-functional approach manages complexity by integrating various optimization goals into a single unified system rather than separate management processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If routes are optimized to minimize overlapping, then operational efficiency improves, but route planning complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice delivery efficiencyVSAvoidroute planning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by evaluating multiple possible routes against fullness criteria and selecting optimal combinations. The feedback loop continuously assesses route configurations, identifies overlapping, and adjusts route selections to minimize overlap while maintaining efficiency, automating the complexity management process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary optimization process that automatically generates and evaluates multiple route options, selecting the best combination without requiring manual intervention. This intermediary computational layer handles the planning complexity by systematically processing route possibilities and selecting optimal solutions based on predefined criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If real-time route conditions are monitored and adjusted, then service quality improves, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidcomputational processing power
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial optimization by focusing computational resources on key decision points such as determining service area assignments and selecting between multiple possible routes. Rather than continuously optimizing every aspect of every route in real-time, the system performs sufficient optimization to achieve service quality improvements while limiting excessive computational processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11790290B1System and method for optimizing waste / recycling collection and delivery routes for service vehicles
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 WM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US11790290B1 patent drawing
  • US11790290B1 patent drawing
  • US11790290B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for optimizing waste or recycling routes for one or more service vehicles are disclosed. Service providers can determine optimal sets of routes for a fleet of vehicles to traverse in order to service customers more quickly and efficiently. Unique route shapes can be utilized to minimize route overlapping and route balancing can be utilized to produce routes with more manageable daily workloads.