Dynamic Satellite Interference Coordination via I/N Ratios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for coordinating non-geostationary satellite systems impose strict and inflexible operational constraints due to fixed topocentric angle thresholds, leading to unnecessary interference reduction and increased complexity in managing radio resources.

Innovation Solution

A method that dynamically determines triplets of limit values for angles and interference-to-noise ratios to adapt transmission power, allowing for a distribution of signal-to-noise and interference ratios that exceed a reference distribution, thereby optimizing operational constraints for each specific situation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed topocentric angle thresholds are imposed for coordination, then interference protection is ensured, but operational flexibility and system capacity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference protectionVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by replacing fixed topocentric angle thresholds with dynamic, adaptable constraints. The coordination mechanism now determines constraints based on actual interference-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios in real-time, allowing the system to adapt to varying operational conditions while maintaining interference protection. This transforms the rigid angular separation requirement into a flexible power and ratio-based coordination approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the coordination parameters from fixed angular thresholds to variable interference-to-noise ratio thresholds. By determining triplets of limit values (two angles and an interference-to-noise ratio) that satisfy distribution requirements, the system dynamically adjusts operational constraints based on actual signal conditions, thereby maintaining reliability while improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If strict operational constraints are applied to protect against interference, then link quality is maintained, but transmission capacity and system productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink qualityVSAvoidtransmission capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by determining interference-to-noise ratio limits that are sufficient to maintain acceptable link quality distributions rather than eliminating all interference. The coordination mechanism identifies the minimum necessary constraints (triplets of limit values) that satisfy the distribution requirement, allowing transmissions to proceed when interference levels are acceptable, thus maintaining link quality while preserving transmission capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes from binary constraint application (either constrained or unconstrained) to continuous parameter adjustment based on interference-to-noise ratios. By determining limit values that satisfy distribution requirements, the system allows operational flexibility within acceptable quality bounds, thereby maintaining link quality while maximizing transmission capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If fixed angular constraints are imposed on satellite transmissions, then interference coordination is simplified, but the number of operational constraints to manage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination mechanismVSAvoidresource management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a multi-functional coordination mechanism that determines triplets of limit values applicable to multiple satellite constellations and terrestrial stations. This universal approach replaces numerous constellation-specific angular constraints with a unified interference-to-noise ratio-based framework, simplifying the coordination mechanism while improving resource management efficiency across diverse systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes from managing multiple fixed angular constraints to managing dynamic interference-to-noise ratio parameters. By determining limit values based on actual signal conditions rather than predetermined angles, the coordination mechanism becomes more efficient, reducing the number of constraints to manage while maintaining effective interference coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11166290B2Method for determining constraints of a non-geostationary system with respect to another non-geostationary system
Publication Date: 2021.11.02 THALES SA
  • US11166290B2 patent drawing
  • US11166290B2 patent drawing
  • US11166290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining operational constraints for a first constellation of non-geostationary satellites (CONS_I) transmitting towards a terrestrial station (SV) with respect to a second constellation of non-geostationary satellites (CONS_V) linked with the station, the constraints comprising a maximum transmission power of the satellites of the first constellation, the method includes determining triplets of limit values (θ, φ, I/N) of two angles (θ, φ) and of an interference-to-noise ratio (I/N), the angles (θ, φ) defining a position of a satellite (NGSO_I) of the first constellation relative to the station and to a satellite (NGSO_V) of the second constellation and the interference-to-noise ratio being the ratio between interferences (I) transmitted by the first constellation on a link between the station and the satellite of the second constellation and the noise (N) of the link, the determination of the triplets being performed so that a distribution of signal-to-noise and interference ratios (R) aggregated over a time interval is greater than a reference distribution (REF); determining at least the maximum transmission power of at least one satellite of the first constellation from the triplets.