Dynamic Scan Rate Adjustment for Touch Gesture Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile devices face challenges in efficiently capturing touch gestures due to high power consumption from frequent sampling and potential false gestures, which can lead to malfunction and user dissatisfaction.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a fingerprint sensor 'long touch' authentication to enable touch gestures and incorporating a gesture timeout to selectively increase scan rate after authentication, reducing power consumption and minimizing false gesture recognition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the device samples the sensor at a very high rate to capture swipe gestures, then gesture detection accuracy is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture detection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the scan rate adjustable rather than fixed. The system dynamically transitions between a lower default scan rate and a higher gesture-detection scan rate based on whether a touch is detected. This resolves the contradiction by using high sampling rates only when needed for gesture detection, while using lower rates otherwise to conserve power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by using two different scan rates at different times. The system periodically checks for touch at a lower rate, and when touch is detected, switches to a higher periodic scan rate for gesture detection. After gesture detection completes or timeout occurs, it returns to the lower periodic scan rate, thus balancing accuracy and power consumption through time-based periodic variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Use of energy by moving object

If the device uses a lower scan rate to save power, then power consumption is reduced, but gesture detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidgesture detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the scan rate based on touch state. When no touch is detected, it operates at a lower scan rate to conserve power. When touch is detected, it dynamically switches to a higher scan rate to ensure accurate gesture detection, thus resolving the contradiction between power saving and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary touch detection at a lower scan rate before committing to high-rate gesture detection. This preliminary action allows the system to identify potential gestures without immediately consuming high power, and only increases scan rate when actually needed, thus balancing power consumption and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the device increases scan rate continuously to detect all gestures, then gesture detection capability is improved, but false gesture recognition increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse gesture recognition
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts scan rate based on actual touch presence rather than continuously maintaining high scan rate. By switching to high scan rate only when touch is detected and returning to low scan rate otherwise, the system improves gesture detection capability when needed while reducing the conditions that lead to false gesture recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from touch detection to control scan rate. When touch is detected, feedback triggers increased scan rate for accurate gesture capture. When no touch is present, feedback returns the system to low scan rate, preventing false gestures from being misinterpreted. This feedback-based control resolves the contradiction between detection capability and false recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Object-generated harmful factors

If the device uses a gesture timeout mechanism, then false gesture recognition is reduced, but response time for legitimate gestures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse gesture recognitionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The timeout mechanism dynamically controls the duration of high scan rate operation. Once a touch is detected, the system switches to high scan rate and maintains it for a timeout period to complete gesture detection. If no gesture is detected within the timeout, it returns to low scan rate. This dynamic timeout approach reduces false gestures while minimizing time loss for legitimate gestures by using high scan rate only when actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10831308B2Touch gesture detection and resolution
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
  • US10831308B2 patent drawing
  • US10831308B2 patent drawing
  • US10831308B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for enhanced touch gesture detection and resolution in mobile electronic communications devices entail scanning a touch sensor of the device at a first scan rate, detecting a touch of a finger and determining that the touch has remained present for at least a first threshold period. In response to this determination, the touch sensor is scanned at a second scan rate that is higher than the first scan rate, and it is determined using this second scan rate that a swipe gesture has occurred at the touch sensor within a second threshold period. In response to the swipe gesture, an action is executed at the device.