Dynamic Sealing via Azimuthal Vortex Variation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dynamic sealing technologies, such as those using axial-symmetric cavities, fail to effectively control pressure drop and fluid flow between moving surfaces, leading to inefficiencies in applications like plunger movement in gas lift wells, as they do not fully exploit turbulence and interaction effects between vortices.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a tool with cavities on its outer surface featuring a geometry that generates a toroidal vortex and includes fluid sealing elements inducing an azimuthal variation, such as sharp disruptions in orientation, to create a more complex vortical structure and increase pressure drop, thereby enhancing sealing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If axial-symmetric cavities are used for dynamic sealing, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the sealing efficiency is insufficient and pressure drop is not effectively controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavity structure simplicityVSAvoidsealing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by introducing non-axisymmetric cavity geometries with varying depths, widths, and angular orientations around the tool perimeter. This breaks the symmetry of conventional cavities to generate complex three-dimensional vortex structures that enhance sealing effectiveness while maintaining manufacturability through controlled geometric variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional axial-symmetric cavity designs to three-dimensional non-axisymmetric geometries by adding angular and radial variations in cavity dimensions. This dimensional enhancement creates multi-directional vortex interactions that significantly improve pressure drop control and sealing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If conventional cavities are used, then the device complexity is low, but the pressure drop control and fluid flow separation are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavity geometry complexityVSAvoidpressure drop control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying cavity dimensions and orientations at different locations around the tool perimeter. Each cavity position has customized depth, width, and angular orientation to optimize local vortex generation and pressure drop characteristics, enabling precise control over fluid flow separation and sealing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Force

If limited contact is used to minimize friction drag, then the tool can move freely, but fluid flow control and sealing effectiveness are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction dragVSAvoidfluid flow control
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent leverages hydraulic principles by using cavity-generated vortices to control fluid flow patterns in the annulus. The non-axisymmetric cavities create three-dimensional vortex structures that manipulate pressure distributions and flow separation, enabling effective fluid flow control and sealing without requiring direct mechanical contact between the tool and conduit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a more efficient dynamic seal, increasing pressure drop and reducing fluid leakage, as demonstrated by numerical modeling, which shows a 9% increase in pressure drop with the same flow rate, and allows for better separation of gas and water in gas-producing wells.

Implementation Method 1

a cavity geometry configured to generate a toroidal vortex

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectToroidal vortex: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

a fluid sealing element in the cavity configured to induce an azimuthal variation of the toroidal vortex

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAzimuthal variation of vortex: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 3

increasing pressure drop, thereby enhancing sealing efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS8714936B2Fluid sealing elements and related methods
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)
  • US8714936B2 patent drawing
  • US8714936B2 patent drawing
  • US8714936B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and mechanisms for fluid sealing are provided. The disclosed mechanisms include a tool having a cavity configured to form a toroidal vortex and a fluid sealing element to induce an azimuthal variation of the toroidal vortex (a “dynamic seal”). The fluid sealing element may include a sharp change in the axial symmetry of the cavity to induce the azimuthal variation. Some exemplary shapes of the fluid sealing element may include a notch in a cavity, a step shaped cavity, or an angular cavity in the tool. Methods for manufacturing such a dynamic seal is also provided as well as methods for producing hydrocarbons with a plunger having the dynamic seals. The tool may be a plunger, a pig, an in-flow control device, or other cylindrical device traveling through a conduit or tubular member.