Dynamic Seat Assignment Using Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seat assignment methods for events, such as assigning seats too far in advance, lead to inefficient use of seating capacity, reduced user satisfaction, and lower revenue generation due to changes in attendee plans and unmet seating preferences.

Innovation Solution

A seat assignment server that uses historical attendance data and machine-learning models to assign seats to users upon arrival, considering factors like seat quality, user preferences, and real-time seat availability, to optimize seating arrangements dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If seats are assigned in advance to users, then users have designated seating, but seating capacity utilization decreases and revenue generation is reduced due to no-shows and plan changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat assignment convenienceVSAvoidseating capacity utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static advance seat assignment to dynamic seat assignment upon arrival. The machine-learned model continuously processes real-time attendance data and user characteristics to optimize seat allocation, allowing the system to adapt to changing attendance patterns and maximize capacity utilization while maintaining user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the timing parameter of seat assignment from advance assignment to upon-arrival assignment. By collecting and analyzing user characteristics and historical attendance data at the moment of arrival, the system optimizes seat allocation based on actual attendance patterns, thereby improving capacity utilization without compromising user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If seats are assigned in advance, then users have predetermined seating, but user satisfaction decreases due to inability to accommodate changing needs and preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat assignment convenienceVSAvoidflexibility for changing needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables dynamic adaptation to changing user needs by performing seat assignment at the moment of arrival rather than in advance. The machine-learned model processes real-time user characteristics and preferences, allowing the system to accommodate last-minute changes in seating requirements while maintaining operational convenience through automated assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows users to effectively self-serve their seating preferences by providing the machine-learned model with their characteristics and preferences upon arrival. The model then autonomously determines optimal seat assignments based on user input and historical data, eliminating the need for advance commitment while maintaining user control over seating preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If seats are assigned in advance, then users have guaranteed seating, but revenue generation is reduced due to empty seats from no-shows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat guaranteeVSAvoidrevenue generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and analysis of user characteristics and historical attendance patterns before the actual seat assignment occurs at arrival. This preliminary preparation enables the machine-learned model to make accurate predictions and optimal assignments in real-time, ensuring reliable seat allocation while maximizing revenue by filling seats that would otherwise remain empty due to no-shows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes feedback from historical attendance data and user characteristics to continuously improve seat assignment accuracy. By analyzing past attendance patterns and user preferences, the machine-learned model refines its predictions, ensuring reliable seat guarantees while optimizing revenue generation through better utilization of seating capacity based on learned patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250181967A1Machine-learned seat prediction and assignment
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 JUMP PLATFORMS INC
  • US20250181967A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181967A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181967A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The seat assignment server access user historical attendance data for events at a venue during a season of events. Each user is associated with a subscription to the season of events such that a seat at the venue is not assigned for the user until the user arrives at the venue. The seat assignment server then generates a set of training data based on the accessed historical attendance data and trains a machine-learned model using the generated set of training data. The machine-learned model is configured to identify a seat quality based on characteristics and historical attendance data of the user. The seat assignment server receives a request from the user for a seat at the venue for the event when the user arrives at the venue. The seat assignment server assigns a seat at the venue to the user by applying the machine-learned model to characteristics and historical attendance data associated with the user to identify a seat quality and selecting the seat based on the identified seat quality.