Dynamic Security Patrol Guidance System for Adaptive Route Optimization
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing security systems lack the ability to automatically and dynamically adjust security guard patrol routes in response to changing conditions, such as new security alerts, camera installations, and guard locations, leading to inefficient and static patrol patterns.
Innovation Solution
A system that establishes a geospatial boundary, uses location-based technology to determine security alerts and camera coverage, and dynamically updates a patrol list for security guards, ensuring they focus on areas at risk and not already covered by cameras or guards.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If security guards follow static patrol routes, then patrol coverage is maintained, but the system cannot adapt to changing security conditions such as new alerts or camera installations
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic patrol routing where patrol routes are automatically recalculated based on real-time security conditions. The system continuously monitors security alerts, camera coverage, and guard locations to generate updated patrol lists, transforming static routes into adaptive, changing pathways that respond to current threats and resource availability
Solution Approach 2:
The system incorporates continuous feedback loops where security alerts, camera status, and guard positions are constantly monitored and fed back into the patrol routing algorithm. This feedback mechanism enables the system to automatically adjust patrol routes in response to changing conditions, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to new information
2Productivity
If security guards patrol all areas uniformly, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but time is wasted on areas already covered by cameras or other guards
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by differentiating patrol requirements across different spatial zones. Areas are categorized based on camera coverage and security risk levels, with patrol lists dynamically generated to direct guards only to areas that specifically need human presence, rather than uniform patrol of entire facilities
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing security conditions, camera coverage, and guard locations to generate optimized patrol routes without manual intervention. The patrol management system autonomously identifies which areas need patrolling and assigns them to appropriate guards, eliminating the need for manual patrol planning
3Speed
If manual patrol routing is used, then system complexity is low, but the system cannot respond quickly to new security alerts or changes in guard availability
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces manual mechanical routing processes with automated computational systems. Instead of security managers manually planning routes based on paper maps and phone communications, the system uses algorithms to automatically calculate optimal patrol paths based on real-time data from security sensors, cameras, and guard mobile devices
Data Source
AI summary
A security patrol guidance system and method configured to automatically and dynamically identify patrol areas within a geospatial boundary and notify the security guards of said areas. The system and method considers recent security alerts, non-visible areas, and SMP operator identified patrol areas in view of the current locations of each security guard to create a patrol list. The patrol list includes areas deemed to be at risk of future security event and the system instructs security guards to patrol said areas at certain intervals. The system is constantly updating to ensure that a desired level of security is achieved at all times.


