Dynamic Sensing Boundary for AGV Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collision avoidance systems for automated guided vehicles (AGVs) in indoor environments are inadequate due to limitations in sensing capabilities, leading to potential collisions between AGVs and other objects, with ultrasonic and infrared sensors providing limited conical sensing areas and vision-based systems requiring significant computational power and having slower response times.

Innovation Solution

A collision avoidance apparatus for AGVs that includes an object detection sensor assembly and a controller to dynamically adjust a sensing region's size and shape, using optical, acoustic, or laser signals to detect objects and prevent collisions by generating control signals to stop the AGV or alert operators, with the ability to be retrofitted onto existing vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If ultrasonic or infrared sensors are used for collision avoidance, then the system can detect objects, but the sensing area is limited to a conical region which reduces detection coverage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing areaVSAvoidcollision avoidance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the boundary of the sensing region dynamically adjustable. The controller modifies the boundary's size and shape based on the AGV's operational state, such as extending the boundary when the AGV is stationary or moving slowly, and retracting it when moving quickly. This dynamic adjustment optimizes both the sensing coverage area and the reliability of collision avoidance by adapting to real-time operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Area of stationary object

If vision-based systems are used for object detection, then detection coverage is improved, but computational power requirements increase and response time decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the sensing region into multiple zones with different boundary characteristics. The sensing region is segmented into a first region with a first boundary and a second region with a second boundary, allowing different detection strategies or sensitivity levels in different areas. This segmentation reduces the computational burden compared to processing the entire field of view while maintaining adequate detection coverage in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a fixed sensing boundary is used, then the system is simpler to implement, but false positives increase when AGV position varies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidobject detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic boundary that adjusts based on the AGV's position and operational state. When the AGV is near a destination or operating in specific zones, the boundary is repositioned or resized to match the actual risk area. This dynamic approach maintains high detection accuracy by adapting to contextual factors while avoiding false positives that would occur with a fixed boundary, and the controller manages this dynamically without requiring overly complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances safety and efficiency by accurately detecting objects within the AGV's path, reducing false positives through dynamic boundary adjustments, and enabling multiple AGVs to operate safely in confined indoor environments.

Implementation Method 1

the object detection sensor assembly is configured to generate a detection signal to define a sensing region and receive a reflected detection signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

the at least one transmitter is configured to transmit the detection signal and the one or more receivers is configured to receive the reflected signal, the reflected signal being reflected off one or more objects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11364903B2Automated guide vehicle with a collision avoidance apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 LOGISTICS & SUPPLY CHAIN MULTITECH R&D CENT LTD
  • US11364903B2 patent drawing
  • US11364903B2 patent drawing
  • US11364903B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collision avoidance apparatus for use with an automated guided vehicle (AGV) includes: an object detection sensor assembly; a controller in electronic communication with the sensor assembly; the object detection sensor assembly configured to generate a detection signal to define a sensing region and receive a reflected detection signal; the controller configured to: process the reflected signal to detect presence of an object based on a parameter of the reflected signal, define a boundary within the sensing region, dynamically adjust the size and/or shape of the boundary, and determine if the detected object is located within the boundary.