Dynamic Device Sensitivity Control via Movement Rate Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing device sensitivity control methods fail to dynamically adjust based on user movement changes, leading to suboptimal interaction experiences, particularly in applications requiring precise directional control.

Innovation Solution

A method implemented by a processor that monitors device movement and adjusts sensitivity based on user-initiated directional and magnitude changes, comparing first and second directional rates to determine movement changes and update sensitivity settings accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If device sensitivity is kept constant, then operation simplicity is maintained, but interaction precision deteriorates for different movement speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction precisionVSAvoidsensitivity control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static sensitivity control to dynamic sensitivity adjustment. The system continuously monitors user movement characteristics (speed, distance, pattern) and automatically adapts the device sensitivity in real-time. This resolves the contradiction by making sensitivity a dynamic parameter that changes according to usage context, thereby improving interaction precision without requiring complex manual configuration from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring user movement patterns and using this information to adjust sensitivity settings. The system observes movement characteristics, compares them against predefined thresholds or learned patterns, and automatically modifies sensitivity accordingly. This closed-loop feedback approach improves interaction precision while keeping the control system relatively simple, as the adjustments are automatic and context-driven rather than requiring complex user input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If device sensitivity is increased for faster actions, then response speed improves, but control precision deteriorates for slower actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by making sensitivity a dynamic parameter that adapts to the user's current movement characteristics. When fast movements are detected, the system increases sensitivity to maintain response speed. When slow, precise movements are detected, the system decreases sensitivity to maintain control precision. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize both response speed and control precision depending on the immediate usage context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the sensitivity parameter based on detected movement characteristics. The system monitors movement speed, distance, and pattern, then adjusts the sensitivity parameter accordingly. This allows the same device to provide different sensitivity levels for different types of actions, thereby maintaining both fast response for quick actions and high precision for slow, deliberate actions without requiring separate devices or complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If device sensitivity is decreased for precision control, then control granularity improves, but response speed deteriorates for faster actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol granularityVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction through dynamic sensitivity adjustment based on real-time movement analysis. When the system detects that the user is performing actions requiring fine control (slow, deliberate movements), it decreases sensitivity to provide enhanced control granularity. When fast actions are detected or required, the system increases sensitivity to maintain response speed. This dynamic behavior allows the system to optimize control granularity and response speed according to the immediate operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically modifying the sensitivity parameter based on detected usage patterns. The system monitors movement characteristics such as speed, distance, and consistency, then adjusts the sensitivity parameter to provide appropriate control granularity. This allows the same device to deliver fine-grained control when needed for precision tasks while maintaining adequate response speed for faster actions, eliminating the need to choose between the two opposing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9971425B2Dynamic device sensitivity control
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9971425B2 patent drawing
  • US9971425B2 patent drawing
  • US9971425B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, a computer program product, and an information handling system is provided for controlling a device sensitivity based on a change of movement of the device. A device movement with a device sensitivity controlled by a user movement is monitored for a change in rate of movement or direction. The sensitivity of the device is controlled based on the change.