Dynamic Sensor Control for Vehicle Stop Reason Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional roadside assistance systems fail to distinguish between urgent and non-urgent situations causing vehicle stops, leading to inefficient or inappropriate assistance, especially in unfamiliar areas where users may struggle to request help safely and effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes real-time data to determine a vehicle's location and reason for stopping, using sensors and diagnostic codes to differentiate between urgent and non-urgent situations, and automatically requests assistance or provides information based on the situation, including notifications to the user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional roadside assistance systems are used, then vehicles can receive assistance when stopped, but the system cannot distinguish between urgent and non-urgent situations leading to inefficient or inappropriate assistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassistance appropriatenessVSAvoidassistance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its response based on real-time analysis of the vehicle's situation. It continuously monitors diagnostic codes, location data, and vehicle status to determine whether the stop is urgent or non-urgent, and adapts the assistance response accordingly - automatically requesting help for urgent situations while only offering assistance for non-urgent ones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops that analyze vehicle diagnostic data, location information, and stopping patterns to continuously improve its classification accuracy. The feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from previous identifications and refine its ability to distinguish between urgent and non-urgent situations over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the system collects and processes detailed sensor data to identify stop reasons, then the accuracy of issue identification improves, but the complexity of data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestop reason identification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses on specific key indicators from the vast amount of available sensor data - primarily diagnostic codes, location information, and vehicle operational status. By selectively extracting only the most relevant data elements rather than processing all available data, the system achieves high identification accuracy while managing processing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The data processing is segmented into distinct analytical stages: collecting raw sensor data, filtering for relevant parameters (diagnostic codes, location, vehicle status), analyzing the combination of factors to determine stop reason, and generating the appropriate response. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If the system automatically requests roadside assistance for all stopped vehicles, then user convenience is improved, but unnecessary assistance requests increase wasting resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of assistance request generation based on the classified stop reason. For urgent situations, it automatically generates assistance requests without user intervention. For non-urgent situations, it either generates no request or generates one only after explicit user confirmation, thereby changing the resource allocation behavior based on situation severity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11783644B1Dynamically controlling sensors and processing sensor data for issue identification
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US11783644B1 patent drawing
  • US11783644B1 patent drawing
  • US11783644B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and apparatuses for identifying a type of issue associated with a stopped vehicle are provided. The system may determine a current location of the vehicle and determine whether the vehicle is currently located on a highway. In some examples, the determined location of the vehicle may cause the system to transmit instructions controlling an amount or type of data collected by sensors and/or transmitted to the system. If the vehicle is on a highway, the system may then determine whether the vehicle is stopped. If so, the system may determine a reason for the vehicle stopping. Upon determining that the vehicle is stopped for an urgent reason, the system may transmit a request for roadside assistance to a service provider computing device and may generate a first type of notification. Upon determining that the vehicle is stopped for a non-urgent situation reason, the system may generate and transmit a second type of notification for display.