Dynamic Communication Frequency Adjustment in Home Automation Sensors
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing home automation networks face challenges in optimizing communication between autonomous devices, leading to inefficient energy use and unnecessary communications due to inflexible communication frequency settings and lack of adaptability to varying application needs.
Innovation Solution
A configuration method that involves a discovery phase where devices exchange operating criteria, a comparison phase to evaluate compatibility, and an update phase to define optimized communication instructions, allowing devices to adapt their communication protocols to balance energy efficiency and reactivity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Stability of the object's composition
If periodic communication is used with a predetermined frequency, then communication is regular and predictable, but data is only updated at the predetermined frequency (lack of responsiveness) and energy autonomy is penalized
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic communication frequency adjustment where the sensor automatically modifies its communication period based on the variation detected in the physical quantity. When the physical quantity varies significantly, the sensor increases communication frequency to provide more timely updates. When the physical quantity is stable, the sensor reduces communication frequency to conserve energy. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between maintaining regular communication and achieving responsive data updates.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the communication frequency parameter dynamically based on the detected physical quantity variations. The sensor monitors the variation of the physical quantity and adjusts the communication period accordingly - shortening it when variations are detected and lengthening it when the quantity is stable. This parameter change allows the system to balance responsiveness with energy conservation, resolving the contradiction between communication regularity and update speed.
2Speed
If communication frequency is increased to improve responsiveness, then data is updated more frequently, but energy consumption increases and autonomy is penalized
Solution Approach 1:
The sensor dynamically adjusts its communication frequency based on the variation detected in the physical quantity. When the physical quantity is stable, the sensor communicates at a lower frequency to conserve energy. When the physical quantity varies significantly, the sensor increases communication frequency to provide timely updates. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to achieve responsiveness only when needed, thereby reducing overall energy consumption and extending sensor autonomy.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements periodic communication where the sensor transmits data at regular intervals, but the period length is dynamically adjusted based on physical quantity variations. The sensor uses a variable communication period that shortens when variations are detected and lengthens when stability is observed. This periodic action with variable periods allows the system to balance responsiveness with energy conservation, resolving the contradiction between frequent updates and energy consumption.
3Adaptability or versatility
If a single low threshold is set for event triggering communication to protect all applications, then all applications are covered, but unnecessary communications increase and autonomy is penalized
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by customizing the communication triggering threshold for each specific sensor-application pair based on their individual operational characteristics. Instead of using a single universal threshold, the system determines optimal thresholds that are specific to each application's needs and the sensor's capabilities. This allows each communication link to have its own optimized threshold, reducing unnecessary communications for applications that don't require high sensitivity while ensuring adequate coverage for those that do, thereby conserving sensor autonomy.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the triggering threshold parameter dynamically during the configuration phase based on the specific sensor and application characteristics. The system determines optimal threshold values that are adapted to each individual sensor-application pairing rather than using a fixed universal threshold. This parameter adaptation allows the system to cover different application requirements effectively while minimizing unnecessary communications, thus resolving the contradiction between application coverage and energy conservation.
4Speed
If event triggering communication is used, then communication is irregular but responsive to events, but the control point must be listening almost constantly which strongly penalizes autonomy
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements self-service by enabling the sensor to autonomously determine when communication should occur based on detected physical quantity variations. The sensor monitors its own measurements and decides when to transmit data without requiring continuous control point intervention or constant listening. This self-service approach allows the sensor to initiate communication only when necessary, reducing control point energy consumption while maintaining responsive event detection.
Solution Approach 2:
The system uses feedback from the sensor's detection of physical quantity variations to trigger appropriate communication behavior. The sensor continuously monitors the physical quantity and uses this feedback to determine when communication should occur - triggering communication when variations are detected and remaining silent when the quantity is stable. This feedback mechanism allows the control point to listen intermittently rather than constantly, significantly reducing energy consumption while maintaining responsive event detection capability.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
The method involves comparing operating criteria of an equipment (NA) e.g. measuring sensor, with communication requirements defined for an installation, and defining communication instructions relative to future communication between the equipment and a control point of another equipment (NB). The communication instructions are transmitted from the latter equipment to the former equipment, where the communication instructions comprise frequency instruction of information emission by the former equipment. Independent claims are also included for the following: (1) a domotic installation comprising an equipment (2) a computer program comprising a computer program code for executing a step of a method for configuring a domotic installation.