Dynamic Sensor Selection for Remote Device Location Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional RTLS systems face limitations in accurately determining the location of remote devices due to issues such as multipath fading and communication bandwidth, which affect the ability to communicate between object devices and remote devices.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that dynamically selects a subset of sensors or anchors on an object, such as a vehicle, to conduct ranging procedures based on their operational status and performance metrics, ensuring only acceptably operational devices participate in location determination, using communication protocols like UWB and Bluetooth LE, and employing backchannel interfaces for sensor communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all sensors are used for ranging procedures, then the system has high redundancy and reliability, but the accuracy deteriorates due to inclusion of non-operational sensors affected by multipath fading and communication bandwidth limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidlocation determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sensor network into operational and non-operational subsets. The control system evaluates each sensor's operational status individually and selectively includes only operational sensors in ranging procedures, thereby eliminating the negative impact of non-operational sensors on location accuracy while maintaining system reliability through the availability of multiple sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different operational criteria to different sensors based on their individual performance characteristics. Each sensor is evaluated locally for its operational status using metrics such as signal strength, communication quality, and ranging procedure success, allowing the system to optimize location determination accuracy by selecting sensors with locally superior performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If operational status verification is implemented, then the location determination accuracy improves by excluding non-operational sensors, but the system complexity increases due to additional control mechanisms and communication protocols

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors perform self-evaluation of their operational status by monitoring their own performance metrics such as communication quality and ranging procedure success. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for complex external verification systems, as each sensor autonomously determines its suitability for participation in location determination procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements a feedback mechanism where sensors report their operational status and performance metrics to the control system, which then makes informed decisions about sensor selection. This feedback loop enables accurate location determination by continuously updating the set of operational sensors based on real-time performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If dynamic sensor selection is performed, then the location accuracy improves by optimizing communication pathways, but the time consumption increases due to sensor evaluation and selection processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation accuracyVSAvoidtime for ranging procedures
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of sensor operational status before initiating ranging procedures. By pre-screening sensors and identifying operational ones in advance, the system avoids time-consuming evaluations during active ranging, thus reducing the time loss while maintaining location accuracy through selective sensor usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system periodically re-evaluates sensor operational status and updates the set of operational sensors at scheduled intervals. This periodic action balances the need for accurate location determination with time efficiency, as the system does not continuously evaluate all sensors but rather at appropriate intervals to maintain accuracy without excessive time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250310725A1System and method for selecting devices for a location system
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 DENSO CORP
  • US20250310725A1 patent drawing
  • US20250310725A1 patent drawing
  • US20250310725A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are provided a selection, optionally dynamic, of a subset of sensors in a system for determining a location of a remote device relative to an object.