Dynamic Service Provisioning via State Difference Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Service providers face a significant burden in continually generating new provisioning workflows due to changes in customer premises devices, scenarios, and network element models, leading to inefficiencies in service delivery.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven provisioning technique is employed, which dynamically identifies necessary actions based on the difference between the current and new service states of a customer, eliminating the need for predefined workflows by using a subscriber database and resource catalog to map service orders to network elements and configure resources accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If predefined provisioning workflows are used to deliver services to customers, then service delivery can be standardized and managed, but the service provider faces significant burden in continually generating new workflows due to changes in customer premises devices, scenarios, and network element models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice delivery efficiencyVSAvoidworkflow management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic service provisioning by allowing the service state information and resource catalog to self-determine the necessary actions and network elements, eliminating the need for manual workflow creation and updating by service providers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts to changes in customer premises devices, scenarios, and network element models by updating service state information and resource catalog parameters, allowing the provisioning system to automatically adjust without requiring new workflows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the service provider maintains detailed information about service state and resource catalogs, then dynamic service provisioning can be achieved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice provisioning adaptabilityVSAvoidprovisioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The service state information and resource catalog serve multiple functions: they store current service configuration, define desired service states, identify network elements, and determine provisioning actions, reducing the need for separate specialized systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The service state information acts as an intermediary between the order management system and the network elements, translating service orders into specific provisioning actions by comparing current and desired service states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11854061B2Service provisioning
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US11854061B2 patent drawing
  • US11854061B2 patent drawing
  • US11854061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In response to an order for a service from a customer, information pertaining to a service state change from a current service state to a new service state of the order is determined, where the current service state relates to a current service provided to the customer. In response to the information pertaining to the service state change, a network element of an infrastructure of network elements to provision is identified.