Dynamic Sharding for Blockchain Node Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The introduction of sharding in blockchain networks increases the risk of data manipulation through consensus attacks and reduces transaction processing efficiency due to imbalanced traffic and node distribution, leading to potential fraudulent blocks and slowed transaction processing.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic sharding system that dynamically adds a new shard by splitting an existing shard, reallocating nodes based on traffic volume, number of nodes, and accounts, ensuring balanced distribution and stability by deriving new and split shard addresses and reallocating nodes to old and new shards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If sharding is introduced to reduce the size of the distributed ledger and increase scalability, then the transaction throughput of the entire network is reduced and ledger size is decreased, but the number of nodes available for verifying transactions decreases and the risk of data manipulation through consensus attacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveledger sizeVSAvoidconsensus attack risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sharding where the number of shards and nodes per shard can change over time. The system dynamically adjusts shard configuration based on network conditions, allowing the ledger size to be managed while maintaining sufficient verification nodes through adaptive reallocation rather than fixed partitioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the verification committee into multiple shards, each with a subset of nodes. This segmentation allows the overall ledger size to be reduced while distributing verification responsibilities across multiple independent shard groups, thereby maintaining security through distributed verification rather than centralized control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the number of shards is increased to handle more transactions, then scalability is improved, but the number of nodes available for verifying transactions decreases and stability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction throughputVSAvoidshard stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of shards based on actual transaction volume and network conditions. When transaction throughput requirements increase, the system can split existing shards or create new ones, but when stability is needed, it can consolidate shards, allowing flexible adaptation to changing productivity requirements while maintaining stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters such as the number of shards, nodes per shard, and shard configuration based on network conditions. This parameter adjustment allows the system to optimize between productivity (more shards for higher throughput) and stability (fewer shards for better security and consistency) as needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If nodes are reallocated to balance traffic distribution, then transaction processing efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing efficiencyVSAvoidnode allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service node allocation where nodes automatically adjust their shard assignments based on traffic conditions and network state. This eliminates the need for complex centralized management of node reallocation, allowing the system to optimize transaction processing efficiency through autonomous adaptation while keeping operational complexity low

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4575826A1Dynamic sharding system and method in blockchain network
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 BLOOM TECH INC
  • EP4575826A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4575826A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4575826A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a dynamic sharding system and method, which involve adding a new-shard by splitting one shard into two in a blockchain network. A dynamic sharding system which runs on nodes constituting a blockchain network, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure, comprises a shard addition determination module for determining whether a shard needs to be added; a new-shard address derivation module for deriving a new-shard address based on the number of shards currently included in the blockchain network; a split-shard derivation module for deriving a split-shard split into a new-shard based on the new-shard address; and a shard allocation module for assigning a portion of the nodes which belong to the split-shard to the old-shard and the rest to the new-shard.