Dynamic Shoreline Evaluation System for Coastal Pollution Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shoreline evaluation methods based on the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) are limited as they only consider static characteristics, failing to effectively respond to coastal pollution due to the lack of dynamic characteristic reflection, which is essential for pollutant removal and shore restoration.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic characteristic-reflected shoreline evaluation system that incorporates data collection units for static and dynamic characteristics, including flow, wave, and sea level information, to determine a shoreline rank that reflects both static and dynamic features, enabling more effective and practical evaluations and response planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If shoreline evaluation is performed using only static characteristics (ESI rank based on shoreline shape), then the evaluation method is simple and easy to implement, but it cannot effectively respond to coastal pollution events because dynamic characteristics are not reflected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of shoreline evaluation for pollution responseVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shoreline evaluation system is segmented into multiple independent modules: data collection unit (collecting static and dynamic characteristics), shoreline evaluation unit (determining shoreline rank), and communication unit. This segmentation allows the system to incorporate complex dynamic characteristics while maintaining manageable system structure and ease of implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shoreline evaluation system is designed to perform multiple functions: evaluating both static characteristics (shoreline shape, ESI rank) and dynamic characteristics (seawater flow, waves, sea level), and generating comprehensive shoreline ranks that reflect both aspects. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by making the system capable of handling pollution response effectively while integrating various evaluation dimensions into a unified framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If only static shoreline characteristics are considered in evaluation, then the evaluation process is quick and simple, but it fails to provide practical guidance for pollutant removal and shore restoration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of shoreline evaluationVSAvoidmissing dynamic characteristic information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection of both static and dynamic shoreline characteristics before pollution events occur. The data collection unit gathers seawater flow characteristics, wave characteristics, and sea level characteristics in advance, so that when pollution events happen, the shoreline evaluation unit can quickly determine accurate shoreline ranks without time-consuming data collection during emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The shoreline evaluation unit acts as an intermediary that integrates information from both static characteristics (ESI rank) and dynamic characteristics (seawater flow, waves, sea level). It synthesizes these diverse data sources into a unified shoreline rank determination that reflects both the physical shoreline structure and the dynamic environmental conditions, preventing information loss while maintaining evaluation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If dynamic characteristics such as seawater flow, waves, and sea level are integrated into shoreline evaluation, then the evaluation becomes more comprehensive and practical for pollution response, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of shoreline evaluationVSAvoidsystem structural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex task of evaluating multiple dynamic characteristics into separate, specialized data collection functions: one for seawater flow characteristics (flow velocities, flow directions), one for wave characteristics (wave heights, wave breaker zones), and one for sea level characteristics. This segmentation reduces system complexity by organizing the complexity into manageable, independent modules that can be implemented and maintained separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shoreline evaluation unit is designed as a multi-functional component that can process and integrate various types of input data (static ESI rank and multiple dynamic characteristics) to produce a unified shoreline rank determination. This universal processing capability allows the system to handle comprehensive evaluation requirements without proportionally increasing overall system complexity, as the evaluation unit serves multiple evaluation dimensions through a single integrated mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240085179A1Dynamic characteristic-reflected shoreline evaluation system and method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 KOREA INSTITUTE OF OCEAN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
  • US20240085179A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085179A1 patent drawing
  • US20240085179A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic characteristic-reflected shoreline evaluation system and a method thereof are proposed. The system may include a data collection processor configured to collect various types of information for shoreline evaluation with respect to an evaluation target region. The system may also include a shoreline evaluation processor configured to determine a shoreline rank by reflecting static characteristics and dynamic characteristics of the evaluation target region on a basis of data collected through the data collection unit. The system may further include an output processor configured to output the various types of information comprising an evaluation result of the shoreline evaluation unit and an overall process and result of the system. The system may further include a communication processor configured to transmit and receive various types of data through wired or wireless communication with an external device. The system may include a controller configured to control an overall operation of the system.