Supply Chain Risk Evaluation Using Dynamic Spatial Scales

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional supply chain risk evaluation systems fail to accurately assess risks on appropriate scales, leading to incorrect or unnecessarily detailed observations, which hinders effective risk management.

Innovation Solution

A supply chain managing device and method that includes a risk data obtaining section, a risk degree calculating section, a scale calculating section, and a risk estimating section to determine and adjust risk values based on appropriate spatial scales, incorporating user input and risk type considerations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If risk data is collected on different scales (country, municipality, latitude/longitude), then comprehensive risk coverage is achieved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to scale inconsistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk coverageVSAvoidrisk evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of spatial scale from fixed to dynamic by introducing a scale calculation mechanism that determines the appropriate scale level based on risk degree. This allows the system to adapt the scale parameter according to the specific risk being evaluated, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive coverage and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system makes the spatial scale dynamic rather than static by calculating the appropriate scale level based on the risk degree of the evaluated object. This dynamic adjustment allows the same risk evaluation system to work accurately across different spatial levels (country, municipality, latitude/longitude) without compromising measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If risks are observed on the largest scale, then broad risk coverage is achieved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to loss of detailed information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk coverage scopeVSAvoidrisk observation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different scale levels to different risk evaluation targets based on their characteristics. High-level risks (affecting entire supply chains) are evaluated at country level, while localized risks are evaluated at municipality or latitude/longitude level, ensuring each risk is observed at the appropriate precision level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the spatial scale parameter dynamically based on the risk degree calculation. When a risk affects a broad area, the scale is set to country level; when it affects a localized area, the scale is refined to municipality or coordinate level, thus maintaining measurement precision while achieving broad coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If risks are observed on fine scale (latitude/longitude), then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk position accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by calculating the appropriate scale level based on risk degree rather than always using the finest scale. This avoids the excessive data processing complexity of latitude/longitude level evaluation for all risks, while still achieving high precision when needed for significant risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the spatial resolution parameter from maximum (latitude/longitude) to an optimized level based on risk degree. This parameter adjustment reduces data processing complexity by avoiding unnecessary fine-scale analysis for low-priority risks while maintaining high precision for critical risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250335855A1Supply chain managing device, supply chain managing method, and supply chain management system
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 HITACHI LTD
  • US20250335855A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335855A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335855A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a supply chain managing device, a supply chain managing method, and a supply chain management system that can evaluate a risk to a supply chain with higher accuracy by indicating the risk to the supply chain on the basis of a more appropriate scale.The supply chain managing device includes a risk data obtaining section configured to obtain risk data, a risk degree calculating section configured to obtain a risk degree corresponding to a type of the risk on the basis of the risk data, a scale calculating section configured to obtain a scale as a spatial position suitable for representing the risk, on the basis of the risk degree, and a risk estimating section configured to obtain the risk value at a specified spatial position, the risk value corresponding to the scale.