Dynamic Specification Auditing for Distributed Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large-scale distributed systems, changes to specifications often lead to compliance issues across multiple components, resulting in significant errors and performance problems due to the complexity of interactions and lack of real-time auditing mechanisms, which can cause widespread failures before non-compliant components are identified.

Innovation Solution

Implementing dynamic specification auditing through a dynamic specification manager that tracks compliance using specification assertion agents, providing continuous monitoring and reporting, and triggering alarms for failures, allowing for fine-grained and coarse-grained auditing across various levels of distributed system components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If static evaluation techniques are used to pre-test components when specifications change, then development cost and time are reduced, but compliance issues and errors are not detected until widespread failures occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to detect compliance issuesVSAvoidsystem reliability before failure detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having specification assertion agents continuously monitor and verify component compliance with specifications in real-time, rather than waiting for static pre-testing. This continuous verification detects compliance issues immediately when they occur, preventing widespread failures while maintaining system reliability through proactive identification and alerting of non-compliant components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by implementing a continuous monitoring system where specification assertion agents constantly check component compliance and provide real-time feedback about specification violations. This feedback mechanism enables immediate detection of compliance issues and allows the system to respond to changes dynamically, resolving the contradiction between early detection and system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If dynamic specification auditing is implemented with continuous monitoring, then real-time compliance detection is achieved, but system complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance detection precisionVSAvoidauditing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the auditing system into independent specification assertion agents, each responsible for monitoring specific components or aspects of the distributed system. This modular approach enables precise compliance detection at component level while managing system complexity through decentralized, independent agents that can be added or removed based on specific monitoring needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by designing specification assertion agents with multi-functional capabilities that can monitor multiple components, evaluate different specification aspects, and provide comprehensive compliance verification. This universal agent design achieves high measurement precision for compliance detection while reducing overall system complexity by using versatile, reusable monitoring units rather than specialized agents for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9374417B1Dynamic specification auditing for a distributed system
Publication Date: 2016.06.21 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9374417B1 patent drawing
  • US9374417B1 patent drawing
  • US9374417B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A distributed system may implement dynamic specification auditing. A specification for a distributed system may be maintained in a machine readable format. Specification assertion agents corresponding to different components of the distributed system may request and receive the specification in order to verify whether tasks performed by the respective component satisfy the specification. The specification assertion agents may then send assertions of the success or failure of the component to be stored in order to verify compliance with specification. Various reports may be generated which identify failures or components in the distributed system that are not reporting assertions.