Dynamic Spray Nozzle Control for Uniform Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pulse signal-based nozzle control systems for liquid spraying result in spotty spray patterns due to long dead times, making them inefficient in agricultural and manufacturing settings where uniform coverage is essential.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic sprayer system with multiple nozzle bodies and tips that use time- or frequency-modulated electronic signals to control fluid droplet release, allowing for continuous operation and seamless overlap of adjacent nozzles to achieve uniform coverage across a wide range of conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pulse signal control is used to manage nozzle operation, then flow rate and fluid pressure can be controlled, but spray patterns become spotty due to long dead times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate control precisionVSAvoidspray pattern uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic pulse signals to actuate the valve, creating controlled on-off cycles that regulate fluid flow. The pulse frequency and duty cycle are optimized to minimize dead time while maintaining precise flow rate control, thereby achieving both accurate metering and uniform spray patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from intermittent pulse control to continuous or near-continuous valve operation by using multiple nozzles in sequence. This ensures that while one nozzle is in its dead time, another is actively spraying, maintaining continuous useful action and eliminating spotty patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Area of stationary object

If multiple nozzles are coordinated for large surface coverage, then spray area increases, but control complexity increases due to PWM coordination requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray coverage areaVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spray system is divided into multiple independent nozzle units, each capable of autonomous operation. This segmentation allows the system to cover large areas by coordinating simple on-off signals to individual nozzles rather than complex PWM control, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining extensive coverage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of controlling all nozzles simultaneously with precise PWM modulation, the system uses partial action by activating only the necessary number of nozzles at any given time based on coverage requirements. This excessive simplification of control logic reduces complexity while still achieving the required spray area through strategic nozzle selection and sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10773271B2Time varying control of the operation of spray systems
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 DEERE & CO
  • US10773271B2 patent drawing
  • US10773271B2 patent drawing
  • US10773271B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include a sprayer system having dynamic pre-sets to control spray nozzles that each individually operates continuously or under a time-modulated or a frequency-modulated electronic signal control to release the liquid droplets. Collectively, adjacent or near neighboring nozzles are also controlled by time-sequencing through different modes of operation or physical configurations on each spray nozzle. The spray nozzles are mounted on a variety of implements including agricultural or industrial spray booms.