Dynamic Stiffness Measurement Using Laser and Impact Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the stiffness of structures only measure static stiffness and fail to provide insight into dynamic stiffness, especially under low-frequency dynamic loads, which can vary significantly from static stiffness.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a test member connected to the structure, a beam generator, an impactor, and a controller, where a beam of light is directed at a measurement surface, and the impactor applies a known impact force, allowing the controller to determine the movement of the measurement surface and calculate the stiffness based on this movement, enabling the measurement of both static and dynamic stiffness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If static load testing with string pot is used to measure stiffness, then static stiffness measurement is achieved, but dynamic stiffness information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiffness measurement capabilityVSAvoidfrequency range coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static measurement to dynamic measurement by applying dynamic impact forces and measuring the structure's dynamic response. The impactor delivers time-varying forces while the laser measures dynamic displacement, enabling stiffness characterization across different frequencies including low-frequency dynamic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical string pot measurement system with an optical laser measurement system. This substitution enables non-contact, high-precision measurement of dynamic displacements while maintaining the ability to measure static conditions, thereby expanding the frequency range coverage without sacrificing measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic impact testing is implemented to measure dynamic stiffness, then frequency-dependent stiffness information is obtained, but measurement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic stiffness measurementVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by integrating both static and dynamic measurement capabilities into a single unified platform. The laser measurement system can operate in both static and dynamic modes, and the data processing methodology can handle both static stiffness and dynamic stiffness (including frequency response functions), eliminating the need for separate testing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes in the impact force (magnitude, duration, location) and the resulting dynamic response to extract stiffness information at different frequencies. By varying these parameters systematically, the system can characterize the structure's stiffness across a range of dynamic conditions without requiring fundamentally different measurement approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive dynamic testing is performed to capture stiffness across frequencies, then low-frequency dynamic stiffness is measured, but testing time and labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive stiffness characterizationVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The impactor delivers a rapid impulsive force that excites the structure across a broad frequency range in a single brief event. This allows the system to capture dynamic stiffness information at multiple frequencies simultaneously during one quick impact, rather than requiring slow, sequential testing at each frequency point, thereby significantly reducing the total measurement time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for the accurate determination of both static and dynamic stiffness, reducing the time and labor required for measurements and providing a more comprehensive understanding of a structure's behavior under various frequencies and loads.

Implementation Method 1

directing a beam of light at a measurement surface carried by at least one of the test member or the structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The movement of the measurement surface may be determined as a function of changes in the length of the beam of light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 3

impacting an impact surface carried by the test member with a known impact force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS8770037B2System and method for structure stiffness determination
Publication Date: 2014.07.08 FCA US LLC
  • US8770037B2 patent drawing
  • US8770037B2 patent drawing
  • US8770037B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In at least one implementation, a method for determining the stiffness of a structure may include connecting a test member to the structure, directing a beam of light at a measurement surface carried by at least one of the test member or the structure, impacting an impact surface carried by the test member with a known impact force, and determining the movement of the measurement surface that is caused by the impact. The movement of the measurement surface may be determined as a function of changes in the length of the beam of light and the stiffness of the structure may be a function of the magnitude of the measurement surface movement.