Dynamic Storage Allocation Based on Environmental Impact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Edge computing systems face environmental and social impacts due to high energy consumption, e-waste generation, inefficient data handling, and unethical labor practices in the production of storage devices, leading to significant carbon emissions and resource inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A data storage controller system that dynamically allocates data to storage resources based on environmental, social, and political impact, implementing energy-proportional infrastructure and effective data lifecycle management to reduce energy consumption and waste, while promoting sustainable practices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by stationary object

If data is stored using conventional storage devices in edge computing systems, then data storage capacity is achieved, but environmental impact increases due to high energy consumption and carbon emissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiddata storage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes storage parameters by selecting between different storage devices (HDD vs SSD) based on real-time environmental impact assessments. The controller monitors carbon intensity metrics and adjusts storage allocation decisions accordingly, switching between energy-efficient HDDs during low-carbon periods and faster SSDs when energy is abundant, thereby optimizing the balance between energy consumption and data storage productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The storage system implements dynamic allocation where the choice of storage device is not fixed but adapts continuously based on environmental conditions. The controller dynamically evaluates carbon intensity, energy availability, and storage requirements to make real-time decisions about which storage devices to activate and use, transforming a static storage infrastructure into a dynamic, environmentally-responsive system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If high-performance storage devices are deployed to improve data processing speed, then productivity increases, but environmental harm increases due to e-waste generation and resource inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing speedVSAvoide-waste generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a recovery approach by extending the operational lifecycle of storage devices through intelligent workload management. Instead of discarding SSDs after short periods of high-performance use, the controller recovers their value by continuously monitoring their performance degradation and reallocating workloads before failure occurs, thereby reducing the frequency of device replacement and e-waste generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The system strategically uses shorter-lived, high-performance SSDs only when absolutely necessary for time-critical workloads, while relying on longer-lived, lower-cost HDDs for archival storage. This selective use of disposable-style high-performance devices minimizes their replacement frequency and associated e-waste, while still achieving productivity goals when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Quantity of substance

If multiple storage devices are used to increase storage capacity, then data storage capability improves, but device complexity increases making management difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidstorage device management
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage controller acts as an intelligent intermediary between the heterogeneous storage devices and the computing system. It abstracts the complexity of managing multiple different storage device types by providing a unified interface and automatically handling device selection, workload allocation, and performance optimization, thereby enabling high storage capacity without proportionally increasing management complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Use of energy by stationary object

If energy-proportional infrastructure is implemented to reduce energy consumption, then environmental sustainability improves, but storage performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidstorage performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial high-performance action by using SSDs only for the specific portion of data that requires fast access, while storing the majority of data on energy-efficient HDDs. This partial use of high-performance devices maintains reliability for critical operations while avoiding the excessive energy consumption that would result from using SSDs for all storage operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240103743A1Methods and apparatus to store data based on an environmental impact of a storage device
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 INTEL CORP
  • US20240103743A1 patent drawing
  • US20240103743A1 patent drawing
  • US20240103743A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods are disclosed to store data based on an environmental impact of a storage device. An example apparatus to store data, the apparatus includes programmable circuitry to at least one of instantiate or execute the machine readable instructions to determine a first environmental impact associated with storing the data in a first storage device, determine a second environmental impact associated with storing the data in a second storage device, and cause the data to be stored in one of the first storage device or the second storage device based on the first environmental impact and the second environmental impact.