Dynamic Storage Unit Pricing via Desirability Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pricing strategies for self-storage units do not accurately reflect their desirability, leading to potential revenue losses from underpricing desirable units and overpricing less desirable ones, as they do not dynamically adjust based on availability and customer perception.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that dynamically ranks storage units within a pricing group based on their desirability and adjusts their pricing tiers accordingly, ensuring that the most desirable units are priced higher and less desirable units are priced lower, based on real-time availability and customer demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If static pricing groups are used for storage units, then pricing simplicity is maintained, but revenue optimization is lost due to inability to reflect individual unit desirability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue optimizationVSAvoidpricing structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments storage units into different pricing groups based on desirability characteristics (location, accessibility, amenities). Each pricing group has its own pricing strategy, allowing the system to optimize revenue for each segment while maintaining overall simplicity through automated classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes pricing parameters (rates, discounts, promotions) based on unit desirability metrics, occupancy levels, and market conditions. This allows revenue optimization without requiring complex manual intervention, as the system automatically adjusts parameters based on predefined criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If all storage units in a pricing group are charged the same rate, then administrative simplicity is maintained, but revenue loss occurs from underpricing desirable units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue maximizationVSAvoidpricing management simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different pricing strategies to different storage units within the facility based on their specific desirability characteristics. Units with better locations, accessibility, or amenities receive differentiated pricing, allowing revenue maximization while the system handles the complexity of individual unit assessment automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If pricing is adjusted frequently based on occupancy, then revenue optimization improves, but pricing stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofit margin optimizationVSAvoidpricing structure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic pricing adjustments based on occupancy thresholds and time-based patterns (seasonal, monthly, weekly). This allows profit optimization through regular updates while maintaining stability by using predictable, rule-based adjustment cycles rather than continuous volatile changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Productivity

If desirable storage units are priced higher, then revenue from premium units increases, but customer satisfaction may decrease due to perceived price differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue from premium unitsVSAvoidcustomer dissatisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent justifies price differences through local quality characteristics - units with superior locations, accessibility, climate control, or amenities are priced higher because they provide tangible additional value to customers. This transparency in differentiating quality levels helps maintain customer satisfaction while capturing premium revenue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11816613B2System and method for adaptive and dynamic pricing of self-storage storage units
Publication Date: 2023.11.14 VERITEC SOLUTIONS
  • US11816613B2 patent drawing
  • US11816613B2 patent drawing
  • US11816613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for dynamically pricing available storage units based on desirability is described. A server computer accesses a data storage storing a storage unit inventory for a particular facility. Each storage unit in the storage unit inventory is pre-assigned to a pricing group and provided a desirability rank. In response to a trigger for generating an updated sales plan for the particular facility (or for all facilities in a company), the server computer obtains an available storage unit inventory by deducting the unavailable storage units from the storage unit inventory and orders the available storage units within each pricing group by each unit's desirability rank. The server computer then assigns each of the available storage units to one of a plurality of pricing tiers within the pricing group according to the desirability rank order and generates an updated sales plan containing the available storage unit inventory grouped by the pricing group and by the pricing tiers.