Dynamic Synchronization Control for Automatic Musical Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ensemble systems cannot dynamically adjust the degree of synchronization between a human performer's performance and an automatic performance instrument during a musical performance, leading to inflexible synchronization adjustments and increased processing loads.

Innovation Solution

A control method and device that utilize a dynamic model to adjust the coupling coefficient γ, allowing the automatic performance instrument to change its synchronization degree with the human performer in real-time by updating state variables based on detection results and performance position, enabling flexible synchronization adjustments without the need for extensive preliminary learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the degree of synchronization is fixed in advance, then the system complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different performance scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidadaptability to performance scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic model where the coupling coefficient γ is updated in real-time based on the performer's actual performance position and tempo. This allows the automatic performance instrument to dynamically adjust its synchronization degree with the human performer, transitioning from a static fixed synchronization system to a dynamic adaptive system that responds to actual performance conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of coupling coefficient γ from a fixed value to a dynamically updated value based on performance detection results. By continuously adjusting this parameter according to the performer's actual tempo and position, the system achieves adaptability without requiring complex reconfiguration, thus resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If extensive preliminary learning is performed to achieve flexible synchronization, then the adaptability improves, but the productivity decreases due to increased processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexible synchronization capabilityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary learning only once before the performance to establish initial synchronization parameters. During the actual performance, it uses a dynamic model to update the coupling coefficient in real-time based on detected performance position, avoiding the need for continuous extensive learning processes and thus maintaining high processing speed while achieving flexible synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the performer's own performance data (detected position and tempo) to automatically adjust the coupling coefficient without requiring external intervention or extensive pre-programming. This self-adjusting mechanism enables flexible synchronization while keeping processing requirements minimal during performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the synchronization degree is changed in real-time, then the adaptability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time synchronization adjustmentVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the detection result of the performer's actual performance position is continuously fed back to update the coupling coefficient γ. This feedback loop enables real-time synchronization adjustment without requiring complex control systems, as the update rule is based on a straightforward dynamic model that processes detection results and adjusts parameters accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10636399B2Control method and control device
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 YAMAHA CORP
  • US10636399B2 patent drawing
  • US10636399B2 patent drawing
  • US10636399B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control method includes receiving a detection result relating to a first event in a performance; changing a following degree in a middle of the performance to which a second event in the performance follows the first event; and determining an operating mode of the second event based on the following degree.